docs: update golangci-lint docs (#406) #407
Conversation
- document the use of v1 - document configuring parallel use of v1 and v2 linters for the same project for code review and CI/Cd, respectively; OR suggest to disable linting in code reviews to avoid a warning - provide links to both v1 and v2 configuration documentation
WalkthroughThe documentation for the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/tools/golangci-lint.md (3)
15-21: Suggestion: Use plural for section header and clarify scope.Consider renaming “## Supported Version” to “## Supported Versions” to reflect both v1 and v2 handling. You might also briefly note that v2 configs trigger a warning.
23-30: Nitpick: Add comma for improved readability.Insert a comma after “pipelines” to separate clauses more cleanly:
- This will allow v2 linting in CI/CD pipelines while also enabling CodeRabbit to use v1.x linting for review comments. + This will allow v2 linting in CI/CD pipelines, while also enabling CodeRabbit to use v1.x linting for review comments.
44-44: Consider clarifying v1-only support wording.You could revise to “supports only v1 configuration file formats” to reinforce that v2 configs aren’t accepted here.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/tools/golangci-lint.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/tools/golangci-lint.md
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ng This will allow v2 linting in CI/CD pipelines while also enabling CodeRabbit to use v...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/tools/golangci-lint.md (2)
31-34: Clear disabling instructions.The “Disable golangci-lint in CodeRabbit” section is concise and the example config key is accurate.
54-56: Links section updated.The added links to both v1 and v2 configuration docs are correct and helpful.
document the use of v1
document configuring parallel use of v1 and v2 linters for the same project for code review and CI/Cd, respectively; OR suggest to disable linting in code reviews to avoid a warning
provide links to both v1 and v2 configuration documentation