-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Insights: graphql/graphql-spec
Overview
-
- 6 Merged pull requests
- 1 Open pull request
- 0 Closed issues
- 2 New issues
Could not load contribution data
Please try again later
6 Pull requests merged by 4 people
-
Add validation rule that operation types exist
#955 merged
Jun 26, 2025 -
Do not exclude schema keyword if schema has description
#1167 merged
Jun 26, 2025 -
Define "execution result" and "request error result"
#1159 merged
Jun 26, 2025 -
Add Appendix C - Specified Type System Definitions
#1037 merged
Jun 26, 2025 -
[RFC] Prevent @skip and @include on root subscription selection set
#860 merged
Jun 5, 2025 -
Add 'Assert' consistency to algorithm format check
#1168 merged
Jun 5, 2025
1 Pull request opened by 1 person
-
Add descriptions to executable documents | 2025 Update
#1170 opened
Jun 5, 2025
2 Issues opened by 2 people
-
Relax the validation of field selection on mutually exclusive types
#1171 opened
Jun 12, 2025 -
Add a section about schema evolution?
#1169 opened
Jun 3, 2025
15 Unresolved conversations
Sometimes conversations happen on old items that aren’t yet closed. Here is a list of all the Issues and Pull Requests with unresolved conversations.
-
Schema Coordinates
#794 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 40 new comments -
RFC: OneOf Input Objects
#825 commented on
Jun 13, 2025 • 10 new comments -
Spec edits for incremental delivery, Section 3 & 7 only
#1124 commented on
Jun 13, 2025 • 2 new comments -
Define Data Collections used in the spec
#1102 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 1 new comment -
Service capabilities / error behaviors
#1163 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 1 new comment -
Literal types support
#878 commented on
Jun 4, 2025 • 0 new comments -
[RFC] Add `@requiresOptIn` directive
#943 commented on
Jun 19, 2025 • 0 new comments -
[RFC] Default value coercion rules
#793 commented on
Jun 5, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Define 'execution' as in 'before execution begins'
#894 commented on
Jun 5, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Fix CoerceArgumentValues() hasValue
#1056 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 0 new comments -
[RFC] List coercion algorithm
#1058 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 0 new comments -
[RFC] Type system ordering of: object interfaces, directive arguments, input object fields, enum values
#1063 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Fragment arguments/variables (syntax/validation/execution)
#1081 commented on
Jun 19, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Recommend that order of unordered collections is maintained where possible
#1092 commented on
Jun 26, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Incremental Delivery spec draft
#1110 commented on
Jun 12, 2025 • 0 new comments