Skip to content

gcve: remove nsx-gateway #8234

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025
Merged

gcve: remove nsx-gateway #8234

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025
+1 −357

Conversation

chrischdi
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi commented Jun 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The case for GCVE got resolved.

I would like to share an update regarding the issue we noticed that there is an issue with Cloud NAT port allocation. After reviewing the situation, we identified that the problem stemmed from the port allocation settings. To resolve this, we enabled dynamic port allocation on the Cloud NAT and set the minimum and maximum ports per VM to 32,768 and 65,536, respectively.

This was part of GCVE which is not accessible as a user and got solved by the support team.

Note: terraform is already applied / destroyed (for nsx-gateway)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from upodroid and xmudrii June 25, 2025 11:54
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ area/infra/gcp Issues or PRs related to Kubernetes GCP infrastructure area/terraform Terraform modules, testing them, writing more of them, code in infra/gcp/clusters/ sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 25, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @sbueringer
/assign @fabriziopandini

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e56091f into kubernetes:main Jun 25, 2025
3 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.34 milestone Jun 25, 2025
sbueringer
sbueringer reviewed Jun 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
infra/gcp/terraform/k8s-infra-gcp-gcve/README.md
@@ -50,15 +50,6 @@ resource pools and other vSphere components required when running tests. See:

# Working around network issues
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chrischdi Could it be that the Gateway VM is still on the picture? (GVCE.draw.io.png) (should be GCVE btw :D)

@chrischdi chrischdi mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sbueringer sbueringer sbueringer left review comments

@upodroid upodroid Awaiting requested review from upodroid

@xmudrii xmudrii Awaiting requested review from xmudrii

Assignees

@sbueringer sbueringer

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/infra/gcp Issues or PRs related to Kubernetes GCP infrastructure area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ area/terraform Terraform modules, testing them, writing more of them, code in infra/gcp/clusters/ cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.34
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@chrischdi @sbueringer @k8s-ci-robot @fabriziopandini