Skip to content

[LoopInterchange] Modernize loops (NFC) #146105

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 28, 2025

Conversation

artagnon
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 27, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146105.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp (+11-14)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
index 9e3b4b82cc454..51971a47527bd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
@@ -551,12 +551,10 @@ struct LoopInterchange {
     //
     // For the old pass manager CacheCost would be null.
     DenseMap<const Loop *, unsigned> CostMap;
-    if (CC != nullptr) {
-      const auto &LoopCosts = CC->getLoopCosts();
-      for (unsigned i = 0; i < LoopCosts.size(); i++) {
-        CostMap[LoopCosts[i].first] = i;
-      }
-    }
+    if (CC)
+      for (auto [Idx, Cost] : enumerate(CC->getLoopCosts()))
+        CostMap[Cost.first] = Idx;
+
     // We try to achieve the globally optimal memory access for the loopnest,
     // and do interchange based on a bubble-sort fasion. We start from
     // the innermost loop, move it outwards to the best possible position
@@ -972,8 +970,8 @@ areInnerLoopExitPHIsSupported(Loop *InnerL, Loop *OuterL,
 static bool areOuterLoopExitPHIsSupported(Loop *OuterLoop, Loop *InnerLoop) {
   BasicBlock *LoopNestExit = OuterLoop->getUniqueExitBlock();
   for (PHINode &PHI : LoopNestExit->phis()) {
-    for (unsigned i = 0; i < PHI.getNumIncomingValues(); i++) {
-      Instruction *IncomingI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(PHI.getIncomingValue(i));
+    for (Value *Incoming : PHI.incoming_values()) {
+      Instruction *IncomingI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Incoming);
       if (!IncomingI || IncomingI->getParent() != OuterLoop->getLoopLatch())
         continue;
 
@@ -1132,15 +1130,14 @@ int LoopInterchangeProfitability::getInstrOrderCost() {
   for (BasicBlock *BB : InnerLoop->blocks()) {
     for (Instruction &Ins : *BB) {
       if (const GetElementPtrInst *GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(&Ins)) {
-        unsigned NumOp = GEP->getNumOperands();
         bool FoundInnerInduction = false;
         bool FoundOuterInduction = false;
-        for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumOp; ++i) {
+        for (Value *Op : GEP->operands()) {
           // Skip operands that are not SCEV-able.
-          if (!SE->isSCEVable(GEP->getOperand(i)->getType()))
+          if (!SE->isSCEVable(Op->getType()))
             continue;
 
-          const SCEV *OperandVal = SE->getSCEV(GEP->getOperand(i));
+          const SCEV *OperandVal = SE->getSCEV(Op);
           const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(OperandVal);
           if (!AR)
             continue;
@@ -1220,8 +1217,8 @@ LoopInterchangeProfitability::isProfitablePerInstrOrderCost() {
 
 /// Return true if we can vectorize the loop specified by \p LoopId.
 static bool canVectorize(const CharMatrix &DepMatrix, unsigned LoopId) {
-  for (unsigned I = 0; I != DepMatrix.size(); I++) {
-    char Dir = DepMatrix[I][LoopId];
+  for (auto Dep : DepMatrix) {
+    char Dir = Dep[LoopId];
     if (Dir != 'I' && Dir != '=')
       return false;
   }

@artagnon artagnon merged commit be9502b into llvm:main Jun 28, 2025
7 checks passed
@artagnon artagnon deleted the li-modernizeloops-nfc branch June 28, 2025 10:41
rlavaee pushed a commit to rlavaee/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
rlavaee pushed a commit to rlavaee/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants