Add css-page-template-1

[browser-specs-bot]

URL

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-template-1/

Rationale

• See repository: w3c/csswg-drafts
• Would-be shortname: css-page-template-1

Additional properties

{}

[browser-specs-bot]

Changes to index.json

This update would trigger the following changes in index.json:

Add spec (1)

{
  "url": "https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-template-1/",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "css-page-template-1",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "css-page-template",
    "currentSpecification": "css-page-template-1",
    "title": "CSS Pagination Templates",
    "shortTitle": "CSS Pagination Templates",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-template/"
  },
  "seriesVersion": "1",
  "organization": "W3C",
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Working Group",
      "url": "https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/"
    }
  ],
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-template-1/",
    "status": "Editor's Draft",
    "alternateUrls": [
      "https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-page-template-1/",
      "https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-page-template/"
    ],
    "repository": "https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts",
    "sourcePath": "css-page-template-1/Overview.src.html",
    "filename": "index.html"
  },
  "title": "CSS Pagination Templates Module Level 3",
  "source": "spec",
  "shortTitle": "CSS Pagination Templates 3",
  "categories": [
    "browser"
  ],
  "standing": "good"
}

Tests

These changes look good! 😎

Crawl results for CSS Pagination Templates Module Level 3

Crawl summary:

• Title: CSS Pagination Templates Module Level 3
• Date: 3 February 2014
• Canonical URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-template-1/
• Spec defines:
  • Headings: 17 found
  • IDs: 22 found
  • Links: 9 rawlinks
• No Algorithms, CDDL, CSS, Events, References, Terms, Web IDL definitions found

[tidoust]

The spec has not been updated since 2014, and is still flagged as "not ready for implementation". Also, note the spec does not follow the usual format.

[github-actions]

The specification was updated on 2025-04-30 (last reviewed on 2025-04-28).

[github-actions]

The specification was updated on 2025-06-29 (last reviewed on 2025-04-28).

[tidoust]

No actual change, the update is probably just a side-effect of the spec having been re-generated.
Now, there's not a lot of sense to keep that spec in the monitor list after all: it's more in an "ice box" than anything else. Moving the spec to the ignore list.