Skip to content

[css-ui-4] define appearance: base-select #12402

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

josepharhar
Copy link
Contributor

This was resolved here:
#10440 (comment)

Base appearance for the select element and its picker is going to be published in the HTML spec very soon.

This was resolved here:
w3c#10440 (comment)

Base appearance for the select element and its picker is going to be
published in the HTML spec very soon.
@josepharhar josepharhar requested a review from dbaron June 26, 2025 17:51
<dt><dfn>base-select</dfn>
<dd>
The effect of ''appearance/base-select'' depends on the element it is applied to:
<dl class=switch>
Copy link
Member

@dbaron dbaron Jun 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest two changes here:

  • first, switch the order of the two items in this list so that the second one can just be "Everything else" (and you don't have to repeat "other than the <select> element" in the definition either).
  • second, for the <select>/::picker(select) case, I think it's better to fully defer to the definition of appearance/base (as you do for the other half) rather than trying to repeat it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done and done, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@dbaron dbaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now, though I think it would be good if you could also fix the indentation so it matches the surroundings (which I think likely uses tabs -- if so you should also use tabs).

Copy link
Member

@dbaron dbaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(I thought I hit the "Approve" radio button last time... but see above comment.)

@josepharhar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good now, though I think it would be good if you could also fix the indentation so it matches the surroundings (which I think likely uses tabs -- if so you should also use tabs).

Done, thanks!

@dbaron dbaron merged commit c523154 into w3c:main Jun 26, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants