Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.2: Remove promise of URIs for tags, note alternatives #4505

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: v3.2-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Member

@handrews handrews commented Mar 27, 2025

Since #4480 has been rejected, replace the promise of a future URI-based alternative with advice to look outside of the OAS.

@lornajane feel free to propose or submit an alternative, this is my interpretation of your intent from the proposal rejection but may not be accurate. Also, it is not my intent for this to come across as some sort of passive-aggressive sulking but I realize it might and very much want pushback if that is the case- I really do just want to point people towards the recommende solution. Which would seem to be Overlays?

  • schema changes are included in this pull request
  • schema changes are needed for this pull request but not done yet
  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

@handrews handrews added clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec metadata tags, info, license, contact, markdown usage, etc. labels Mar 27, 2025
@handrews handrews added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Mar 27, 2025
@handrews handrews requested review from a team as code owners March 27, 2025 15:46
@ralfhandl ralfhandl requested a review from a team March 28, 2025 08:01
@handrews handrews changed the title 3.2: Remove promise of URIs for tags, not alternatives 3.2: Remove promise of URIs for tags, note alternatives Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec metadata tags, info, license, contact, markdown usage, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants