Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix comment misdirection during scaling loss #36987

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

techkang
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

If the GA loss bug is not fixed, we should scale the loss properly. However, it is not solely for reporting purposes as described in the previous comment. https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/src/transformers/trainer.py#L3764

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

@SunMarc @muellerzr @ArthurZucker

Copy link

Hi 👋, thank you for opening this pull request! The pull request is converted to draft by default. The CI will be paused while the PR is in draft mode. When it is ready for review, please click the Ready for review button (at the bottom of the PR page). This will assign reviewers and trigger CI.

@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft March 26, 2025 02:31
@Rocketknight1
Copy link
Member

cc @muellerzr @SunMarc

@techkang techkang marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2025 14:39
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from muellerzr and SunMarc March 26, 2025 14:39
Comment on lines +3755 to 3757
# Finally we need to normalize the loss if GA loss bug is not fixed during compute loss
if not self.model_accepts_loss_kwargs and self.compute_loss_func is None:
loss = loss / self.args.gradient_accumulation_steps
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this condition if not strong enough. Users can overwrite compute loss and not use num_item_per_batch at all when calculating the loss (e.g trl case as I explained here ). The issue is that right now it won't scale the loss.
Maybe we should create a variable to enable/disable the GA fix but in transformers, we set enable it since we are calculating the loss the right way.

Copy link
Member

@SunMarc SunMarc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ! Left some thoughts regarding the condition below

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants