How best to define workspaces for server-side editing? #1492
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi @RyszardWithAZ, there are a few things that might help:
I am curious why you have a local folder in the same workdpace as your server-side ones. That shouldn't affect performance, but it's not something we recommend. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the info. I unfortunately can't remove generated or filter down further because my product is basically "everything", and I need to many times reference & examine both generated classes & routines. I tried using ObjectScript: Open... and that definitely works better, I will use it! I don't know why I have the local folder anymore, I seem to remember years ago either VSCode or the ObjectScript plug-in required a local folder, otherwise the other isfs folders wouldn't display. But now it looks like that's no longer the case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We have more than 20,000 .INT routines and also have thousands of classes. We start to have performance issues with this many objects in VSCode.
For me, having one namespace with the ISFS definitions split up between just classes and just routines seems to work fine.
However, once I add a second machine to that list, my Ctrl-P to open a specific routine slows to a crawl.
What's the optimal way of arranging this setup? Is it more performant to have one definition for "everything" per namespace? Or is breaking it up by classes & routines better? What about when there's a 2nd environment in the mix?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions