We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
4.0.6
vue3,ant-design-vue-4.0.6
期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用 1、选择02时后 2、分00、01确实不可选, 3、但是有个默认值02:00:00,点击ok就成了02:00:00 4、可以选择02:00:00 不是我期望的
期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用, 只能选择02:02:02 - 05:05:05的时间
实际目前ant-design-vue-4.0.6版本中 能选出02:00:00的时间
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
4.0.7有遇到过打包后,日期组件通过 focus 事件拉起弹窗的 bug 吗
Sorry, something went wrong.
I have searched the issues of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate. Version 4.0.6 Environment vue3,ant-design-vue-4.0.6 Reproduction link Steps to reproduce 期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用 1、选择02时后 2、分00、01确实不可选, 3、但是有个默认值02:00:00,点击ok就成了02:00:00 4、可以选择02:00:00 不是我期望的 What is expected? 期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用, 只能选择02:02:02 - 05:05:05的时间 What is actually happening? 实际目前ant-design-vue-4.0.6版本中 能选出02:00:00的时间 我遇到了同样的场景
实际目前ant-design-vue-4.0.6版本中 能选出02:00:00的时间 我遇到了同样的场景
This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
No branches or pull requests
Version
4.0.6
Environment
vue3,ant-design-vue-4.0.6
Reproduction link
Steps to reproduce
期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用
1、选择02时后
2、分00、01确实不可选,
3、但是有个默认值02:00:00,点击ok就成了02:00:00
4、可以选择02:00:00 不是我期望的
What is expected?
期望'02:02:02 - 05:05:05' 外其他时间禁用, 只能选择02:02:02 - 05:05:05的时间
What is actually happening?
实际目前ant-design-vue-4.0.6版本中 能选出02:00:00的时间
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: