vote: a new icon for the coming Insomnium v1.0

[archywillhe]

in light of yangzhaox's suggestion, I'm thinking about changing Insomnium icon. So I've used a tool my previous company made to generate a few app icons. Let me know which one is your favourite. Thanks! The most upvoted one will be Insomnium's new icon!

(am also open to using any icon anyone had made: hit me up if you have any suggestions or submissions; thanks!)

half moon	circle

modern computer	retro computer

flow (float)	full moon

[archywillhe]

wow the close trigonometric tie is quite unexpected at 42 votee; I'll pick the 2nd runner for v0.2 onwards and keep watch 👀 for the winner to be used for v1.0

[ubani]

Just as a note flow -> float

[archywillhe]

aw good spot

[archywillhe]

oops "Warning: editing this poll is a destructive action; Changing the poll question and/or options will reset the votes."
looks like I can't update the poll anymore ._.

[paulius-valiunas]

maybe you can update the description without touching the poll?

[bitfl0wer]

a.i "art"? Really? I have to say, this is highly disappointing.

[bitfl0wer]

There are newer generative models trained with royalty-free images or with images that the company has the rights to use, etc.

Okay. Did you use one of those models, or not? The existence of ethical AI models does not disprove my point.

Artists/designers should be paid for the value they contribute

Wow! You're right - that aspect is really taken care of when using an AI art model trained with stolen art!

Also, using this argument, you could just argue away free open-source work altogether. Programmers should be paid for the value they contribute after all, no?

You do not want to host a contest because you think that's exploitation? That's entirely up to you and to how clear you make the terms and conditions of the competition to the competitors.

I do not judge the entirety of this project by its logo.

Edit: Does this also mean, that you will not be accepting any pull requests? They might not be accepted, and programmers should be paid for their work after all (/sarcasm)

[archywillhe]

Did you use one of those models, or not?

Yes.

Programmers should be paid for the value they contribute after all, no?

Of course they should be paid. This is why finding a good way to sustain a FOSS project is important (without diverging from its core-value).

The problem with modern society is that many people/institutions that don't do much shit are getting a lot of resources, while lots of things that are contributing actual value to soceity get little or none.

And most people just waste time time commenting on shit while not doing anything.

Edit: Does this also mean, that you will not be accepting any pull requests? They might not be accepted, and programmers should be paid for their work after all (/sarcasm)

It occurs to me you are just arguing for the sake of arguement now.

[paulius-valiunas]

I won't host a logo contest because crowdsourcing could result in hundreds of artists working for free without the guarantee of payment, which some might perceive as exploitation. I think that is way more unethical.

Each artist decides if he/she wants to participate, knowing the conditions associated with such participation. No one is forcing anyone to work, no one is raising unjustified expectations. Which part of this is "unethical"?

[bitfl0wer]

Which part of this is "unethical"?

It isn't. They are not running a big company which could easily afford artists, nor would they be dangling a reward in front of the participants' faces, which ultimately only one of them will receive. This argument is just as invalid as their claim that they used "ethical trained AI" for their current logo ideas.

I looked into the software they used - Lexica - for a little, to hopefully be able to verify their claim.

Turns out, Lexica uses 2 possible Models: Stable Diffusion, which is most definitely not ethically trained, and Lexica's own "Aperture 3.5" model.

There is no publicly available information on the training data used to make this Aperture model work. I have read through 7 different articles covering the model, and none of them mentioned training data sources at all.

On Lexicas Discord, the question of the ethical perspective of this Model has come up a few times, though. There were some press people and PhD candidates who were looking to have this question answered for different reasons. The developers always responded to other people with other questions, but never did they once even attempt to answer to those who asked about how the model was trained, or what it was trained on.

The only, and I mean only crumb of information I have found was a sole developer's answer, where they stated that they "cannot give an answer to this question"

So, either archy here leaked information that was meant to be kept confidential, or their claims are bullshit.

I don't know about the rest of you, but until I see further evidence/information on this topic, I know what I'll think.

Of course, there is always the possibility of me being wrong, not researching thoroughly enough, etc. . If this was the case: My genuine apologies.

Cheers

[paulius-valiunas]

Even "dangling a reward" is not unethical, just like it's not unethical to sell lottery tickets. You don't have to participate if you don't want to.

[paulius-valiunas]

I chose flow/float just because all the other ones have way too much clutter. Even if you pick that one, I think you should remove the background gradient and stars.

[luigiMinardi]

I'll try to draw something and send you :)

[luigiMinardi]

@archywillhe can't mail you at hello@archgpt.dev getting error: 554 5.7.1 <[hello@archgpt.dev](mailto:hello@archgpt.dev)>: Relay access denied

[AnderssonPeter]

Same here got hello@archgpt.dev, ERROR CODE :554 - 5.7.1 <hello@archgpt.dev>: Relay access denied

[AnderssonPeter]

You can paste images in replies, so if you created something share it :)

[Sammy-T]

@archywillhe Have you received any submissions that could be included in the vote?

[archywillhe]

no. For insomnium to have a proper logo, I need to start with the designer on the concept first - as well as figuring out how to pay him eventually. That will likely be for v1.5 onwards.

Before that I will be sticking with these ad hoc logos generated by AI.

[AnderssonPeter]

Any chance we could add a more flat icon?
The amount of detail in the current icons would be lost when down sized and would make them less readable, also a icon should really be in a vector format not raster.

[AnderssonPeter]

Here is my submission it's rather simple but that isn't a bad thing with an icon. (Also it's svg so can be resized without loosing quality)
(I expect no payment if this ends up being used in this or any other project)

[yerlibilgin]

Guys why doesn't no one vode for retro computer. Its really cool.
And we don't have to look like insomnia after all do we?

[AnderssonPeter]

Looks more like a TV? But it has too much detail to look good when scaled down to 32x32 or 64x64.

[Ranguna]

Too much detail. Simple logos are nice on the eyes (except when they are forced to look simple, looking at you Firefox!)