Open
Description
Hi 👋
love what's happening here.
I'm playing around with stubbing out protocols for common image analysis operations (e.g. scikit-image), and would love to build on what already exists in API_specification/signatures
. I'm wondering if you have any plans to publish/distribute the stubs in that folder to PyPI?
Activity
honno commentedon Mar 27, 2022
I'd be interested in this for the test suite too, where we utilise
signatures
already. Might help us with data-apis/array-api-tests#107.I imagine this could be a completely automated process from this repo (i.e. no separate repo), with calender versioned releases. Have to be mindful of #398—possibly the top-level package could be namespaced with each spec release, e.g.
xp_signatures.v1
. Probably worth waiting until we get a first spec release generally.rgommers commentedon Aug 4, 2022
We now have a final release. This isn't too much work to do. Should we go ahead with this?
honno commentedon Aug 4, 2022
I'd propose we first work on setting up a workflow where the signatures folder is uploaded as-is, available at say the
<pkg_name>.draft
namespace. Then we could get onto uploading versioned namespaces, which might be a bit annoying but still quite do-able.HEAD
#488kgryte commentedon Apr 4, 2024
@honno Is this something that we can move forward?
[-]plans to publish `signatures` to pypi?[/-][+]Plans to publish `signatures` to pypi?[/+]honno commentedon Apr 10, 2024
I think we'd really want to get in #589 first (which LGTM but we'd want someone else to give the go-ahead, then we can ping nstarman to see if they can update/rebase the PR (or if not available I can have a go).
Then we could publish basically as-is, or I could update #472 with said changes assuming folks are happy with the direction I was going for... I'll have a think over but again #589 is blocking anywho IMO.