feat(cast mktx --raw-unsigned): add way to accept signatures to build a transaction #10167
Description
Component
Cast
Describe the feature you would like
for reference, this is what i wish to achieve using foundry tools
https://medium.com/@LucasJennings/a-step-by-step-guide-to-generating-raw-ethereum-transactions-c3292ad36ab4
Thanks to the newly introduced --raw-unsigned flag, I am able to create a raw RLP transaction, hash it and sign it using cast wallet sign
what is left is to be able to use the signature to create a new RLP transaction, which now includes the created signature using cast mktx to create a raw ethereum transaction
As per the medium article reference, Step 4 is to be tackled.
Hope this was enough information, let me know if this is feasable
Thanks
Additional context
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status
Milestone
Relationships
Development
Participants
Activity
AdvayAgrawal commentedon Mar 25, 2025
hi @zerosnacks. Is this feature feasible?
zerosnacks commentedon Mar 25, 2025
Yes it is, we've marked it as a good first issue
cc @yash-atreya
[-]Feature request: Add field in `cast mktx --raw-unsigned` to accept signatures to build an ethereum transaction[/-][+]feat(`cast mktx --raw-unsigned`): add way to accept signatures to build an ethereum transaction[/+][-]feat(`cast mktx --raw-unsigned`): add way to accept signatures to build an ethereum transaction[/-][+]feat(`cast mktx --raw-unsigned`): add way to accept signatures to build a transaction[/+]AdvayAgrawal commentedon Mar 25, 2025
great, glad to hear that. Thanks @zerosnacks
A-y-ush commentedon Mar 26, 2025
Hi, @zerosnacks is this issue available to work on?
I wanna know if I understand the problem correctly
When we create an unsigned transaction using the
cast mktxcommand without the--raw-unsignedflag, the transaction is EIP-2718 encoded. During this time, it gets both signed and encoded.But in the case of using the
--raw-unsignedflag, the transaction misses the step of RLP encoding too along with the signing part.Am I understanding this correct?
AdvayAgrawal commentedon Apr 21, 2025
hi @zerosnacks @yash-atreya ,
Just wanted to know an update on this, has this issue been resolved, or is there a linked PR?
yash-atreya commentedon Apr 21, 2025
Hey, would you like to submit a PR for this?
4 remaining items