-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
Open
Description
As discussed in #364 we should ideally check whether a DWT feature is supported statically. This is only realistically applicable for cycle count comparisons (but still requires a runtime check) which is only supported on the first comparator. An implementation would then have some DWTComparatorFirst
and DWTComparator
structures that implement a common trait: if cycle count comparison is configured for DWTComparator
, an error is returned.
Opening this issue for discussion purposes for now. At present the documentation warns that cycle count comparison is only available with the first comparator.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
Activity
tmplt commentedon Jan 1, 2022
CC @TDHolmes
TDHolmes commentedon Jan 1, 2022
TDHolmes commentedon Jan 1, 2022
🏷️ #367 (the cycle count PR)
Differentiate comparator 0 as the only one capable of cycle compare
Differentiate comparator 0 as the only one capable of cycle compare
TDHolmes commentedon Jan 2, 2022
I was wrong, only comparator zero is special. Opened up a PR
Differentiate comparator 0 as the only one capable of cycle compare
Differentiate comparator 0 as the only one capable of cycle compare