Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2020. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
64 lines (55 loc) · 4.67 KB

code-organisation-guidelines.md

File metadata and controls

64 lines (55 loc) · 4.67 KB

Code Organisation Guidelines

The document specifies how code in the Cardano SL git repository should be organised. Consistent module naming schemes and file locations make the code relatively uniform so that it is easier for developers (internal and external), engineers working on formal specifications and auditors (internal and external) to navigate the code base.

Currently, the code base does not conform to these guidelines but it is hoped that over time it can move from non-conforming to conforming. Making code conform to these guidelines in one big pull request or one long lived refactoring branch would be a huge amount of work and/or cause a lot of disruption to the regular flow of development. Instead, these guidelines should be applied as a series of small easy-to-review commits that can be merged relatively quickly.

  • All library code for a Haskell package should be in the src directory of that package. Currently some packages use src and others use Pos. For example the lib package currently has testing related code in the src/Test directory that should be be moved to the test directory.

  • The cardano-sl git repository includes a number of distinct Haskell packages like core, util, explorer, networking and so on. All Haskell modules within each of these packages should be given a unique name prefix. All modules within core would have a prefix Pos.Core, modules within util would have a name prefix Pos.Util, modules within networking might have a prefix of Pos.Network and so on. This means that when looking at the imports for a module, it is immediately obvious which package each import comes from. As an example of a file that needs to be renamed/moved the file core/Pos/Aeson/Core.hs should be renamed to core/src/Pos/Core/Aeson.hs so that if it is imported in another module its name Pos.Core.Aeson would immediately suggest its location in the source tree.

  • Tests for a Haskell package should always be a part of the same package as the implementation of the code it is testing. Test code should not be included in the library that a package provides. All test code for a Haskell package should be in the test directory of that package and modules with testing related code should have module names staring with Test and then reflecting the Haskell package which the code is testing, so test code for the core package would have all its test module names begin with Test.Pos.Core. An example of where the current code base contravenes these guidelines is that core and txp currently don't define any tests, but at least some of the functionality in these two modules are tested in lib package.

  • Arbitrary instances for testing should never be in the library source tree and should not be compiled into the library defined by the package. Instead, Arbitrary instances should be under the test directory as per the previous point. When Arbitrary instances or other testing helper functionality needs to be used by other packages, a test specific package should be created. For instance, the core package may have Arbitrary instances that are need for tests in the txp package. In this case, there will be a cabal file core/test/cardano-sl-core-test.cabal which exports the required modules, all of which would have a Test.Pos.Core name prefix. PR #2588 is an example of doing this for the crypto package.

  • The library that a Haskell package provides should never include or export any code that is not part of the API the library provides to clients of the library. It is however valid for a library to provide interface functions to its internals that are required for testing or benchmarking, thus becoming part of the library's API.

  • Benchmarking code should be in a separate tree under the bench directory of the haskell package it is benchmarking. Modules that are solely required for benchmarking should be in the bench sub directory and have module names beginning with Bench and something related to the package they are a part of. For instance, benchmarking code in the core package should have names that start with Bench.Core. An example of code that contravenes part of this is the networking package which provides the module Bench.Network.Commons that is only used by the benchmarking target in the src tree and is also included as an exposed module in the library section of the cabal file.

  • Example code should also be in a separate tree under the example directory of the current package. An example of code that contravenes this is the networking package which provides NTP.Example.