Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Backport "Undo patch of double-block apply" to 3.3 LTS #183

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025
Merged

Backport "Undo patch of double-block apply" to 3.3 LTS #183

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

tgodzik
Copy link

@tgodzik tgodzik commented Mar 14, 2025

Backports scala#21982 to the 3.3.6.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]

som-snytt and others added 3 commits March 14, 2025 19:44
@som-snytt @tgodzik
Undo patch of double-block apply
bcd71f1 
If `f{}{}` is candidate for rewrite, unpatch it.

We don't know exact spans, so just check endpoints to remove.
@tgodzik
Undo patch of double-block apply
ebafdf2 
If `f{}{}` is candidate for rewrite, unpatch it.

We don't know exact spans, so just check endpoints to remove.

[Cherry-picked cc78467][modified]
@bracevac @tgodzik
Revert ListBuffer construction in Rewrites.scala
e69ca30 
[Cherry-picked f6b49df]
Base automatically changed from backport-lts-3.3-22314 to lts-3.3 March 18, 2025 09:45
@tgodzik
Copy link
Author

tgodzik commented Mar 18, 2025

No regressions detected in the community build up to backport-lts-3.3-22366.

Reference

@tgodzik tgodzik merged commit cb73316 into lts-3.3 Mar 18, 2025
22 checks passed
@tgodzik tgodzik deleted the backport-lts-3.3-21982 branch March 18, 2025 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@tgodzik @som-snytt @bracevac