Skip to content

Upgrade Jackson from 2.x to 3.0.0-rc5 #3701

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kurtostfeld
Copy link

@kurtostfeld kurtostfeld commented May 31, 2025

Upgrade Jackson from 2.x to 3.0.0-rc5

@kurtostfeld kurtostfeld force-pushed the jackson3-upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from c10d154 to f4a69b1 Compare June 7, 2025 04:13
@ppkarwasz ppkarwasz self-assigned this Jun 19, 2025
@ppkarwasz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kurtostfeld,

Thank you for your patience. Now that we've released version 2.25.0, I’ll have time to return to the 3.x branch and plan to review your PR soon.

Appreciate your contribution!

@kurtostfeld kurtostfeld changed the title Upgrade Jackson from 2.x to 3.0.0-rc4 Upgrade Jackson from 2.x to 3.0.0-rc5 Jun 20, 2025
@kurtostfeld
Copy link
Author

@ppkarwasz thank you! I see the windows build is failing. I only have MacBooks, but I'll try to figure out what could be causing that.

@ppkarwasz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kurtostfeld,

No need to worry about the Windows build — we have a number of known flaky tests that tend to fail more frequently on Windows. This is largely due to how GitHub runners are provisioned: unlike Linux runners, which use containers, Windows runners are full virtual machines. They tend to be slower and more prone to timing-related issues, which makes race conditions more likely to surface.

We track these flaky tests in Develocity though we rarely find the time to fix them properly. If you're interested in digging into one of these and exploring what kind of synchronization might be missing, contributions are always welcome!

Thanks again for your work on this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: To triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants