Skip to content

Fix inconsistent text color in infrastructure monitor status boxes (#2170) #2171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

mohicody
Copy link
Contributor

@mohicody mohicody commented Apr 29, 2025

Describe your changes

Updated the infrastructure monitor's StatBox component to use the same styling approach as the uptime monitors:

Changed from using custom sx prop with statusStyles to using the standard gradient={true} and status={...} props
Removed the unused statusStyles variable to fix a linting warning
Maintained theme-based styling using theme variables instead of hardcoded values

Write your issue number after "Fixes "

Fixes #2170

Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.

  • (Do not skip this or your PR will be closed) I deployed the application locally.
  • (Do not skip this or your PR will be closed) I have performed a self-review and testing of my code.
  • I have included the issue # in the PR.
  • I have added i18n support to visible strings (instead of <div>Add</div>, use):
const { t } = useTranslation();
<div>{t('add')}</div>
  • The issue I am working on is assigned to me.
  • I didn't use any hardcoded values (otherwise it will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application).
  • I made sure font sizes, color choices etc are all referenced from the theme. I have no hardcoded dimensions.
  • My PR is granular and targeted to one specific feature.
  • I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.

Uptime monitor :

Screenshot 2025-04-28 at 10 37 39 PM

Infrastructure monitors:

Screenshot 2025-04-28 at 10 37 16 PM

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the way status styling is applied in status boxes, switching from custom styles to a more streamlined approach using new component properties. No visible changes to functionality or layout.

Sorry, something went wrong.

fix
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The code change updates the styling approach for status boxes in the infrastructure details page. It removes the custom statusStyles object and its usage, replacing it with component props gradient={true} and status to control the appearance of the status box. The logic for determining the status remains intact, but the application of styles is now handled differently, likely aligning the visual style with other components that use the same props.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx Removed statusStyles import and usage; replaced with gradient and status props for styling

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Green box font colors for infra and uptime monitors should be same (light font for both) (#2170)

Why did the Canadian developer refuse to use custom styles?
Because they preferred everything to be "eh-standardized"!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77715df and 36edb17.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx (2)

14-14: Clean import statement - good job!

You've simplified the import to only include what's being used. This is a good practice that keeps the code cleaner and can help with tree-shaking in modern bundlers.


43-48: Excellent standardization of styling approach!

You've successfully replaced the custom styling approach with the standardized component props pattern. This brings consistency with the uptime monitors' styling approach and should resolve the text color inconsistency issue.

Just like how Americans and Canadians both agree that maple syrup is delicious but disagree on how to pronounce "about", your code now speaks the same styling language across different components!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 Core Changes

  • Primary purpose and scope: Fix inconsistent text color in infrastructure monitor status boxes by aligning styling approach with uptime monitors
  • Key components modified: StatusBoxes/index.jsx - Updated StatBox implementation
  • Cross-component impacts: Standardizes usage of shared StatBox component across monitoring features
  • Business value alignment: Improves UI consistency and readability for critical monitoring interface

1.2 Technical Architecture

  • Component interaction changes: Migrated from custom sx prop styling to standardized component API usage
  • Integration points impact: Better alignment with StatBox component's intended design patterns
  • Dependency changes: Removed unused statusStyles import

2. Critical Findings

2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)

No critical must-fix issues found

2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)

Issue: Hardcoded unit strings without i18n support

  • Analysis Confidence: High
  • Impact: Limits localization capabilities and violates project's internationalization standards
  • Suggested Solution: Wrap unit strings in translation function:
  // Example fix for cores display
  <Typography component="span">{t("cores")}</Typography>

2.3 Consider (P2🟢)

Area: Component documentation

  • Analysis Confidence: Medium
  • Improvement Opportunity: Add JSDoc comments to explain StatBox prop usage

2.4 Summary of Action Items

  1. P1: Add i18n support for unit strings (1-2 hours)
  2. P2: Document component prop usage (30 mins)

3. Technical Analysis

3.1 Code Logic Analysis

📁 client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx - InfraStatBoxes

  • Submitted PR Code:
    <StatBox
      gradient={true}
      status={determineState(monitor)}
      heading={t("status")}
      subHeading={determineState(monitor)}
    />
  • Analysis:
    • Properly leverages StatBox's built-in styling logic
    • Ensures consistent status display handling
    • Eliminates redundant styling configuration
  • Improvement rationale:
    • Reduces component-specific styling overrides
    • Aligns with upstream component design patterns

3.2 Key Quality Aspects

  • Testing strategy: Manual validation shown via screenshots but lacks unit tests for color consistency
  • Documentation needs: Translation keys for unit measurements missing from i18n resources

4. Overall Evaluation

  • Technical assessment: Well-executed component API alignment with minor i18n oversight
  • Business impact: Directly resolves user-reported UI inconsistency
  • Risk evaluation: Low technical risk with high UX value
  • Notable positive aspects: Excellent code cleanup and standardization effort
  • Implementation quality: Focused and maintainable changes
  • Final recommendation: Request Changes (Address P1 i18n requirements before merge)

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ajhollid ajhollid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good, thanks for the contribution!

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit d76e3d4 into develop Apr 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@ajhollid ajhollid deleted the fix/infra-status-text-color-2170 branch April 29, 2025 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Green box font colors for infra and uptime monitors should be same (light font for both)
2 participants