Skip to content

Conversation

Br0wnHammer
Copy link
Member

@Br0wnHammer Br0wnHammer commented May 15, 2025

Describe your changes

This PR fixes infra monitors uptime percentage display.

Write your issue number after "Fixes "

Fixes #2280

Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.

  • (Do not skip this or your PR will be closed) I deployed the application locally.
  • (Do not skip this or your PR will be closed) I have performed a self-review and testing of my code.
  • I have included the issue # in the PR.
  • I have added i18n support to visible strings (instead of <div>Add</div>, use):
const { t } = useTranslation();
<div>{t('add')}</div>
  • I have not included any files that are not related to my pull request, including package-lock and package-json if dependencies have not changed
  • I didn't use any hardcoded values (otherwise it will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application).
  • I made sure font sizes, color choices etc are all referenced from the theme. I have no hardcoded dimensions.
  • My PR is granular and targeted to one specific feature.
  • I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.

Screenshot 2025-05-16 002218

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Removed the display of uptime percentage from the monitors table.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The code update removes the calculation and display of the uptimePercentage property from monitor data in the MonitorsTable component. This field is no longer derived or included in the mapped monitor objects, aligning the UI with the current backend data structure.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Monitors/Components/MonitorsTable/index.jsx Removed calculation and inclusion of the uptimePercentage property from monitor data objects.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove or update uptime percentage field in UI since it is no longer present in backend (#2280)

(You know, if Canadians were handling this, they’d probably apologize for removing the uptime percentage. Americans, on the other hand, would just add more stars to the flag and call it a feature!)

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d48d3b9 and 591fe56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Monitors/Components/MonitorsTable/index.jsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Monitors/Components/MonitorsTable/index.jsx
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@Br0wnHammer Br0wnHammer requested a review from ajhollid May 15, 2025 18:57
Copy link
Collaborator

@ajhollid ajhollid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit 27649b3 into bluewave-labs:develop May 15, 2025
1 check passed
@Br0wnHammer Br0wnHammer deleted the fix/fe/infra-uptime-percent branch May 15, 2025 19:00
Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 Core Changes

  • Primary purpose and scope: Remove deprecated uptime percentage display from monitors table
  • Key components modified: MonitorsTable UI component
  • Cross-component impacts: Table column layout and data presentation
  • Business value alignment: Maintains UI consistency with backend data contracts

2. Critical Findings

2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)

Issue: Orphaned table column header for removed uptime percentage

  • Analysis Confidence: High
  • Impact: Empty column in UI reduces information density and confuses users
  • Resolution: Remove column definition from headers array

Issue: Invalid color calculations using undefined uptimePercentage

  • Analysis Confidence: High
  • Impact: Runtime errors from undefined property access
  • Resolution: Delete percentageColor calculation logic

Issue: Superfluous percentageColor in data objects

  • Analysis Confidence: High
  • Impact: Memory waste and potential future misuse
  • Resolution: Remove percentageColor from returned objects

2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)

Issue: Missing null-safety for monitor properties

  • Analysis Confidence: Medium
  • Impact: Potential undefined access in checks array
  • Suggested Solution: Add optional chaining for monitor.checks[0]?.cpu

2.3 Consider (P2🟢)

Area: Data contract validation

  • Analysis Confidence: Medium
  • Improvement Opportunity: Prevent similar issues with CI validation of backend/frontend data structures

2.4 Summary of Action Items

  1. Remove column header definition (P0 - immediate)
  2. Delete color calculation logic (P0 - immediate)
  3. Clean up data properties (P0 - immediate)
  4. Add null-safety checks (P1 - next sprint)

3. Technical Analysis

3.1 Code Logic Analysis

📁 client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Monitors/Components/MonitorsTable/index.jsx - headers definition

  • Submitted PR Code:
    {
    	field: 'uptimePercentage',
    	headerName: t('monitors.uptime'),
    	width: 120,
    	renderCell: (params) => (
    		<Box sx={{ color: params.row.percentageColor }}>
    			{params.value}%
    		</Box>
    	),
    },
  • Analysis:
    • Orphaned column definition creates empty UI column
    • References removed uptimePercentage field
    • Depends on non-existent percentageColor property
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    // COMPLETELY REMOVE this column definition

📁 client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Monitors/Components/MonitorsTable/index.jsx - data mapping

  • Submitted PR Code:
    const percentageColor = monitor.uptimePercentage < 0.25
        ? theme.palette.error.main
        : monitor.uptimePercentage < 0.5
            ? theme.palette.warning.main
            : theme.palette.success.main;

    return {
        percentageColor,
    };
  • Analysis:
    • Accesses undefined monitor.uptimePercentage
    • Color calculation produces invalid values
    • Unused property wastes memory
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    // REMOVE ENTIRE percentageColor calculation
    // REMOVE percentageColor from returned object
  • Improvement rationale:
    • Eliminates undefined reference errors
    • Reduces memory usage
    • Simplifies data structure

4. Overall Evaluation

  • Technical assessment: Partial implementation requires critical fixes
  • Business impact: Current state risks UI inconsistencies and errors
  • Risk evaluation: High risk of runtime errors in production
  • Notable positive aspects: Correct core approach to remove deprecated field
  • Implementation quality: Requires completion of related cleanup
  • Final recommendation: Request Changes (Address P0 issues first)

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Infra Monitors - Uptime Percentage
2 participants