Skip to content

[RFC]: Add implementation for math/base/special/exp10f #6711

Open
@sahil20021008

Description

@sahil20021008
Contributor

Description

This RFC proposes to add the implementation of math/base/special/exp10f

Related Issues

Related issues #649.

Questions

No.

Other

No.

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the Code of Conduct.
    Searched for existing issues and pull requests.
    The issue name begins with RFC:.

Activity

Deepak91168

Deepak91168 commented on Jun 12, 2025

@Deepak91168
Contributor

Hey @sahil20021008!
Hope you're doing well.

I came across this RFC and would love to contribute to it. If you could share more details about the expected functionality or any specific requirements, I’d be happy to give it a try!

Thanks!

sahil20021008

sahil20021008 commented on Jun 13, 2025

@sahil20021008
ContributorAuthor

Hey @Deepak91168
There arent any specific requirements as far as I can recall.
exp10f function performs same operations but on float32 numbers instead of float64
For specific implementation, you will need to look at the implementation of the same function for some of the other math libraries such as Golang, Ruby, etc

Deepak91168

Deepak91168 commented on Jun 13, 2025

@Deepak91168
Contributor

Hey @Deepak91168 There arent any specific requirements as far as I can recall. exp10f function performs same operations but on float32 numbers instead of float64 For specific implementation, you will need to look at the implementation of the same function for some of the other math libraries such as Golang, Ruby, etc

Hi, just confirming it implement the exponential function e^x specifically for float32 values right?
If so, are there any related functions or internal utilities you’d recommend checking out? I'd appreciate any pointers.

On it!
Thanks!

sahil20021008

sahil20021008 commented on Jun 13, 2025

@sahil20021008
ContributorAuthor

You can go through similar functions like exp10, exp2, etc
You should also go through some float32 functions so that you can get an idea of the basic difference between using single precision and double precision values

Deepak91168

Deepak91168 commented on Jun 14, 2025

@Deepak91168
Contributor

Thanks for explaining!
I think I understood it properly, working on it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @Deepak91168@sahil20021008

      Issue actions

        [RFC]: Add implementation for `math/base/special/exp10f` · Issue #6711 · stdlib-js/stdlib