Part of set-of-tools

[vitorhcl]

There are many pages that contain a "> Part of set-of-tools.", it is kinda informal convention. It would be nice to properly document it. Some questions:

• Would "set-of-tools" need to be enclosed with backticks? For example, ImageMagick tools have "Part of ImageMagick"
• Does every page needs this or only when it isn't clear?
• If it isn't required, is there a need to mantain the consistency on this across every command of a given set of tools?

[kbdharun]

We generally follow this on Let's Document pages (where there isn't anything additional to write in the second line, sometimes when there is too), but I agree that we can document this in the style guide.

Would "set-of-tools" need to be enclosed with backticks? For example, ImageMagick tools have "Part of ImageMagick"

If we highlight the project name then it shouldn't be enclosed in backticks or else for subcommand pages it is indeed suggested to enclose it in backticks.

Does every page needs this or only when it isn't clear?

It depends, we generally use it when it's required (or when there is a free description in the page)

If it isn't required, is there a need to mantain the consistency on this across every command of a given set of tools?

Not really sure tbh, in some commands we add additional notes/sub points whereas we use this as a filler in other pages.