Skip to content

refactor: favor GitHub public names over others #3215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

refactor: favor GitHub public names over others #3215

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

epipav
Copy link
Collaborator

@epipav epipav commented Jun 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Changes proposed ✍️

What

copilot:summary
​
copilot:poem

Why

How

copilot:walkthrough

Checklist ✅

  • Label appropriately with Feature, Improvement, or Bug.
  • Add screenshots to the PR description for relevant FE changes
  • New backend functionality has been unit-tested.
  • API documentation has been updated (if necessary) (see docs on API documentation).
  • Quality standards are met.

@epipav epipav marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2025 11:39
@epipav epipav requested a review from borfast as a code owner June 26, 2025 11:39
@epipav epipav self-assigned this Jun 26, 2025
@epipav epipav changed the title feat: favor GitHub public names over others refactor: favor GitHub public names over others Jun 26, 2025
@epipav epipav added the --skip-regression-tests To skip regression tests in Tinybird CI label Jun 27, 2025
@epipav epipav merged commit 528e5c4 into main Jul 10, 2025
15 of 17 checks passed
@epipav epipav deleted the improvement/favor-github-identities-for-public-names branch July 10, 2025 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@borfast borfast borfast approved these changes

Assignees

@epipav epipav

Labels
--skip-regression-tests To skip regression tests in Tinybird CI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@epipav @borfast