Skip to content

[WIP] testing headless implementation Flex #18659

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

koji
Copy link
Contributor

@koji koji commented Jun 17, 2025

Overview

testing headless implementation Flex

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.75%. Comparing base (7437d21) to head (2a63b6a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on edge.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #18659      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.72%   25.75%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        3281     3283       +2     
  Lines      283650   284308     +658     
  Branches    28594    28678      +84     
==========================================
+ Hits        72968    73211     +243     
- Misses     210655   211070     +415     
  Partials       27       27              
Flag Coverage Δ
protocol-designer 19.16% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
components/src/primitives/Flex.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
components/src/primitives/LegacyFlex.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
components/src/primitives/index.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@koji
Copy link
Contributor Author

koji commented Jun 18, 2025

  • run this branch on ODD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant