Skip to content

fix(esp_now): Fix broadcast example and use nullptr #11490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lucasssvaz
Copy link
Collaborator

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz commented Jun 20, 2025

Description of Change

Fixes broadcast slave example and replaces NULL with nullptr for compiler optimizations.

Tests scenarios

Tested locally

Related links

Closes #11165

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz requested a review from P-R-O-C-H-Y as a code owner June 20, 2025 12:02
@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz added the Area: ESP-NOW Issues and Feature Request about ESP-NOW Protocol label Jun 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello lucasssvaz, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 2b53ed1

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Test Results

 76 files   76 suites   12m 44s ⏱️
 38 tests  38 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
241 runs  241 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 2b53ed1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)

The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.

MemoryFLASH [bytes]FLASH [%]RAM [bytes]RAM [%]
TargetDECINCDECINCDECINCDECINC
ESP32S30⚠️ +2880.00⚠️ +0.03000.000.00
ESP32S20⚠️ +3360.00⚠️ +0.04000.000.00
ESP32C30⚠️ +2260.00⚠️ +0.02000.000.00
ESP32C60⚠️ +2260.00⚠️ +0.02000.000.00
ESP320⚠️ +3200.00⚠️ +0.04000.000.00
Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]
TargetESP32S3ESP32S2ESP32C3ESP32C6ESP32
ExampleFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAM
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Master0000000000
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Slave⚠️ +2880⚠️ +3360⚠️ +2260⚠️ +2260⚠️ +3200
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Network0000000000
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Serial0000000000

@me-no-dev me-no-dev requested a review from Copilot June 21, 2025 10:51
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR replaces all usages of NULL with nullptr for improved clarity and potential compiler optimizations, and fixes the ESP-NOW broadcast slave example.

  • Update constructors, conditionals, and callback registrations to use nullptr.
  • Modify the broadcast slave example to use pointer semantics for masters to avoid dangling pointers on vector reallocation.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
libraries/ESP_NOW/src/ESP32_NOW_Serial.h and ESP32_NOW_Serial.cpp Replaced NULL checks with nullptr in pointer assignments.
libraries/ESP_NOW/src/ESP32_NOW.h and ESP32_NOW.cpp Replaced NULL with nullptr for consistency and modern C++ style.
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Network/ESP_NOW_Network.ino Updated example to use nullptr; minor comment reordering.
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Slave/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Slave.ino Changed broadcast peer initialization to use pointers.
libraries/ESP_NOW/examples/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Master/ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Master.ino Replaced NULL with nullptr; minor code consistency update.

Comment on lines +66 to +72
ESP_NOW_Peer_Class *new_master = new ESP_NOW_Peer_Class(info->src_addr, ESPNOW_WIFI_CHANNEL, WIFI_IF_STA, nullptr);
if (!new_master->add_peer()) {
Serial.println("Failed to register the new master");
delete new_master;
return;
}
masters.push_back(new_master);
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Since master peers are now allocated using raw pointers and stored in a vector, consider using smart pointers (e.g., std::unique_ptr) to ensure proper resource management and avoid potential memory leaks.

Suggested change
ESP_NOW_Peer_Class *new_master = new ESP_NOW_Peer_Class(info->src_addr, ESPNOW_WIFI_CHANNEL, WIFI_IF_STA, nullptr);
if (!new_master->add_peer()) {
Serial.println("Failed to register the new master");
delete new_master;
return;
}
masters.push_back(new_master);
auto new_master = std::make_unique<ESP_NOW_Peer_Class>(info->src_addr, ESPNOW_WIFI_CHANNEL, WIFI_IF_STA, nullptr);
if (!new_master->add_peer()) {
Serial.println("Failed to register the new master");
return;
}
masters.push_back(std::move(new_master));

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: ESP-NOW Issues and Feature Request about ESP-NOW Protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ESP_NOW_Broadcast_Slave unable to handle more than 1 master
2 participants