Testing list blocks with the gRPC Provider

[dsa0x]

Fixes #

Target Release

1.13.x

Rollback Plan

• If a change needs to be reverted, we will roll out an update to the code within 7 days.

Changes to Security Controls

Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.

CHANGELOG entry

• This change is user-facing and I added a changelog entry.
• This change is not user-facing.

[dbanck]

I'm really unsure about the introduction of grpcwrap in the internal/terraform package. It feels like grcpwrap is only used for e2e tests and the simple providers so far. Maybe we can Zoom about this tomorrow?

[dbanck]

Usually the resource identity schemas come from the GetResourceIdentitySchemas call and not the other way around. I feel like extracting it from the ResourceTypes could lead to wrong assumptions

[jbardin]

This provider is a little different, in that it conforms to the internal providers.Provider interface rather than the protobuf interface. That means the schemas are already going to be coalesced into a single object. That's not to say that this may still be missing some edge case, just saying that it's not necessarily wrong to assume they are one and the same at this point.

[dsa0x]

Also, this is only a fallback when you do not provide a separate resource identity response.

[dbanck]

🚢