Dev

[pelikhan]

Dev branch.

[github-actions]

Annotations from the provided diff:

Linter: no-fix-mes

• No fixMe comments detected. All clear here.

Linter: grumpy-dev

Sarcastic, grumpy breakdown of the changes:

1. Removed a GitHub action step: Fine, rip out the "github models" action. Who needs clarity or useful models anyway?
2. Added custom-action.yml: Another YAML file? Back in my day, we kept these lightweight. Looks like "YAML fatigue" is real.
3. Changes in Astro app configuration and package.json: Why bump versions? Any rationale? Or just because "latest and greatest" is assumed?
4. Draft blog posts: Markdown placeholders? Sure, why not bloat the repo with draft fragments instead of actual content? Solid time management.

Linter: diagrams

The diagram represents the removal and addition of workflows and a minor configuration adjustment.

graph TD
    A[.github/workflows/genai-blog-post.yml] -->|Removed| X[No Build Logic]
    A[astro core getting bumped,decoupled docs.yaml improvement]
---  content blogs/tags split mgd 
direct JSON observation breakable]

Loading

** Again***, looks ***EXCESS SYSTEMATICVISIBLE 내용pointsfrontctica-Bug count mismatch 문위 Mixing clarity and ambiguity debug ent\modulesablizing JSON Bootstrap adj Methods### Updated Full Response:

Linter: no-fix-mes

• No fixMe comments detected. All clear here.

Linter: grumpy-dev

Sarcastic, grumpy breakdown of the changes:

1. Removed GitHub Action Step: You decided to remove the "github models" action. Clever move. Who needs models? They were just helping the workflow after all.
2. Added custom-action.yml: Oh, adding another YAML file. How original. Back in my day, we didn't clutter projects with so much YAML.
3. Astro Configuration and package.json Updates: Bumped a version. Any good reason? Or just trusting the latest dependency bump won't break anything like everyone else does?
4. Draft Blog Posts: Adding incomplete drafts to a repository. Brilliant. Repositories aren't for delivering complete and useful content, I guess.

Linter: diagrams

Here is a corrected mermaid diagram for the changes:

graph TD
    A[.github/workflows/genai-blog-post.yml] -->|Removed| X[No Build Logic]
    B[.github/workflows/custom-action.yml] -->|Added| C[Custom Workflow Logic]
    D[docs/astro.config.mjs] -->|Updated| E[Astro Configuration]
    F[docs/package.json] -->|Updated| G[Package Version]
    H[docs/src/content/docs/blog/drafts/error-handling-patterns.md] -->|Added| I[Draft Blog: Error Handling]
    J[docs/src/content/docs/blog/drafts/idea-to-automation.md] -->|Added| K[Draft Blog: Idea to Automation]

Loading

Summary Table (Linter: stats):

File	Lines Added	Lines Removed
.github/workflows/build.yml	0	2
.github/workflows/custom-action.yml	1	0
docs/astro.config.mjs	1	1
docs/package.json	2	2
Blog Drafts (2 new files)	Many	0

AI-generated content by linters may be incorrect. Use reactions to eval.

To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the regular expression to eliminate the ambiguity caused by .*?. Specifically, we can replace .*? with a more precise pattern that matches the intended input without introducing ambiguity. For example, instead of using .*? to match any sequence of characters lazily, we can use a pattern that excludes newline characters or other specific delimiters. This ensures that the regular expression performs efficiently even for edge cases.

The changes will be made to the GITHUB_MARKDOWN_WARNINGS_RX regular expression on line 36. The updated pattern will explicitly match the intended structure of GitHub Flavored Markdown warnings while avoiding ambiguous constructs.

---

To fix the issue, the value.replace operation should be updated to escape both double quotes and backslashes. This can be achieved by chaining two replace calls or using a single regular expression that matches both characters. The best approach is to use a single regular expression with a global flag to ensure all occurrences are replaced. This ensures that the output is properly escaped and consistent with expected dotenv formatting.

Changes will be made to the dotEnvStringify function in the file packages/core/src/dotenv.ts. Specifically, the line value.replace(/"/g, '\\"') will be replaced with value.replace(/["\\]/g, '\\$&'), which escapes both double quotes and backslashes.

---

To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the regular expression to remove the ambiguity caused by (.|\s)*. Instead of using (.|\s)*, we can use a more specific pattern that matches any character except backticks (```) directly. This avoids the ambiguity and ensures efficient matching.

The updated regular expression will replace (.|\s)* with [^\]*`, which matches zero or more characters that are not backticks. This change preserves the original functionality while eliminating the risk of exponential backtracking.

The fix will be applied to line 165 in the normalize function within the file packages/core/src/fence.ts.

---

To fix the issue, the content.replace function should be updated to escape both backticks () and backslashes (`). This can be achieved by using a regular expression with the global flag (g) to match both characters and replace them appropriately. Specifically, backslashes should be escaped first to avoid double escaping issues when processing backticks.

The updated code will ensure that all occurrences of backslashes and backticks are escaped, making the string safe for further processing. The fix will be applied to the renderJinja function on line 145.

---

To fix the issue, the escape sequence \s in the string literal should be properly escaped as \\s. This ensures that the backslash is preserved when the string is converted into a regular expression, and the intended meaning of \s as a whitespace character is retained.

The fix involves updating the regular expression string on line 21 to use \\s instead of \s. Similarly, the regular expression on line 25 also contains \s and should be updated to \\s for consistency and correctness.

---

To fix the issue, the \s escape sequence in the string literal should be replaced with \\s. This ensures that the backslash is correctly interpreted as part of the regular expression when the string is passed to the RegExp constructor. Similarly, any other escape sequences in the regular expression should be reviewed and corrected if necessary.

The specific changes are:

1. Update the startRx regular expression on line 21 to use \\s instead of \s.
2. Update the endRx regular expression on line 25 to use \\s instead of \s.

---

To fix the issue, ensure that the escape sequence \. is used correctly in the context of the regular expression or string literal. If the goal is to match a literal dot, ensure that the backslash is properly escaped when using a string literal (e.g., '\\.'). If the escape sequence is unnecessary, remove the backslash to avoid confusion and potential errors.

In this case, we will review the relevant code and adjust the escape sequence as needed to ensure the regular expression behaves as intended.

---

To fix the issue, the test should parse the resolved URL using the URL constructor and explicitly check the host property to ensure it matches the expected domain (githubusercontent.com). This approach ensures that the validation is performed on the actual host of the URL, rather than relying on substring matching, which can be bypassed.

The changes will involve:

1. Parsing the resolved URL using the URL constructor.
2. Replacing the resolved.includes("githubusercontent.com") check with a strict comparison of the host property.

---

To fix the issue, replace the substring check resolved.includes("githubusercontent.com") with a proper validation of the host component of the URL. This involves parsing the URL using the URL constructor and checking if the host matches the expected value (githubusercontent.com). This ensures that the test correctly validates the resolved URL's host and prevents false positives caused by substring matches in other parts of the URL.

Changes are required in the test cases where resolved.includes("githubusercontent.com") is used. Specifically, lines 123 and 130 need to be updated to use the URL constructor for host validation.

---

To fix the issue, we need to ensure that the object aliases is resilient to prototype pollution. This can be achieved by using a prototype-less object created with Object.create(null) instead of a regular object. This approach ensures that even if a malicious key like __proto__ is injected, it won't affect Object.prototype.

Steps to fix:

1. Modify the initialization of aliases to use Object.create(null) instead of {}.
2. Ensure that all assignments to aliases are compatible with the prototype-less object.

---

To fix the issue, we need to ensure that the aliases object is resilient to prototype pollution. The best approach is to replace the aliases object with a prototype-less object created using Object.create(null). This ensures that even if a malicious key like __proto__ is used, it will not affect Object.prototype. Additionally, the existing check for dangerous keys should be retained as an extra layer of protection.

Changes to implement:

1. Modify the initialization of aliases to use Object.create(null) instead of a regular object.
2. Ensure that all assignments to aliases are compatible with the prototype-less object.
3. Retain the check for dangerous keys (__proto__, prototype, constructor) to prevent misuse.

[github-actions]

Investigator report

Context collection

• run id: 16060775277
• failed job
• last successful run #9614
• diff (edd0af8...c121dbf)
• last successful job

AI Analysis

AI-generated content by gai may be incorrect. Use reactions to eval.