Skip to content

New version: vim.vim.nightly version 9.1.1485 #269418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

chrisbra
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisbra chrisbra commented Jun 27, 2025

Pull request has been created with WinGet Releaser 🚀

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Service Badge  Service Badge  

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-65-269418-20250627-1

@wingetbot wingetbot added New-Manifest Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Completed Validation passed labels Jun 28, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 28, 2025 01:06
@stephengillie stephengillie added the Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR label Jun 28, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot merged commit c394868 into microsoft:master Jun 28, 2025
1 check passed
@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Publish pipeline succeeded for this Pull Request. Once you refresh your index, this change should be present.

@chrisbra chrisbra deleted the vim.vim.nightly-9.1.1485-8C050376E41F44088076DA3CAA6A04C0 branch June 28, 2025 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR New-Manifest Publish-Pipeline-Succeeded Validation-Completed Validation passed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants