test: correct SIMD support comment #58767
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The comment in the test file stated that: "SIMD is not supported on rhel8-ppc64le" This is incorrect -- WASM SIMD support is dependent on the available instructions, not the operating system. So it is more correct to say that WASM SIMD is not supported on IBM Power8 architecture.
nodejs-github-bot
added
esm
Ethan-Arrowood
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
targos
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
juanarbol
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #58767 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13%
=======================================
Files 639 639
Lines 188192 188192
Branches 36911 36912 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 169634 169635 +1
- Misses 11287 11289 +2
+ Partials 7271 7268 -3 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
lpinca
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
RaisinTen
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2025
richardlau
added
author ready
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in eafbe27 |
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2025
The comment in the test file stated that: "SIMD is not supported on rhel8-ppc64le" This is incorrect -- WASM SIMD support is dependent on the available instructions, not the operating system. So it is more correct to say that WASM SIMD is not supported on IBM Power8 architecture. PR-URL: #58767 Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
This was referenced Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The comment in the test file stated that:
"SIMD is not supported on rhel8-ppc64le"
This is incorrect -- WASM SIMD support is dependent on the available instructions, not the operating system. So it is more correct to say that WASM SIMD is not supported on IBM Power8 architecture.
Currently in our CI, it just so happens that all of our
rhel8-ppc64lemachines are IBM Power8, while, for example, therhel9-ppc64lemachines were provisioned as IBM Power9, but AFAIK you could be running either RHEL 8/9 on either architecture (or newer).FTR other (non-IBM) "older architectures" without WASM SIMD support include some Athlon chips (but we don't have any of those in our CI): nodejs/undici#2934 (comment)