Skip to content

chore: pydantic 2.11 #18872

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: pydantic 2.11 #18872

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

sfoster1
Copy link
Member

Bumps the system to use pydantic 2.11, which has much less memory usage when building model classes.

Pretty well tested on flex and ot-2 (ot-2 requires the buildroot pr).

@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from a team as code owners July 10, 2025 13:38
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from smb2268 and removed request for a team July 10, 2025 13:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.82%. Comparing base (9964abd) to head (bb401e1).
Report is 4 commits behind head on edge.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #18872      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.82%   23.82%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3329     3329              
  Lines      287227   287232       +5     
  Branches    35927    35927              
==========================================
  Hits        68420    68420              
- Misses     218781   218786       +5     
  Partials       26       26              
Flag Coverage Δ
protocol-designer 19.03% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
step-generation 5.32% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@SyntaxColoring SyntaxColoring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good once tests pass. Changes requested for a Makefile change that I think is accidental.

@SyntaxColoring
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, tests are failing in edge, I think.

Copy link
Contributor

@SyntaxColoring SyntaxColoring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants