Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

msearch REST API should support source parameter #4901

Closed
dadoonet opened this issue Jan 27, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

msearch REST API should support source parameter #4901

dadoonet opened this issue Jan 27, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@dadoonet
Copy link
Member

As stated in documentation, we should support ?source= parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

# This one works
curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

# This one gives: {"error":"Failed to derive xcontent from org.elasticsearch.common.bytes.BytesArray@0"}
curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
@ghost ghost assigned dadoonet Jan 27, 2014
dadoonet added a commit to dadoonet/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2014
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

# This one works
curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

# This one gives: {"error":"Failed to derive xcontent from org.elasticsearch.common.bytes.BytesArray@0"}
curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes elastic#4901.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

# This one works
curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

# This one gives: {"error":"Failed to derive xcontent from org.elasticsearch.common.bytes.BytesArray@0"}
curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes #4901.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

# This one works
curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

# This one gives: {"error":"Failed to derive xcontent from org.elasticsearch.common.bytes.BytesArray@0"}
curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes #4901.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes #4901.
dadoonet added a commit to dadoonet/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* elastic#4892 : mget
* elastic#4900 : mpercolate
* elastic#4901 : msearch
* elastic#4902 : mtermvectors
* elastic#4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes elastic#4924.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* #4892 : mget
* #4900 : mpercolate
* #4901 : msearch
* #4902 : mtermvectors
* #4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes #4924.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* #4892 : mget
* #4900 : mpercolate
* #4901 : msearch
* #4902 : mtermvectors
* #4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes #4924.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* #4892 : mget
* #4900 : mpercolate
* #4901 : msearch
* #4902 : mtermvectors
* #4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes #4924.
dadoonet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2014
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* #4892 : mget
* #4900 : mpercolate
* #4901 : msearch
* #4902 : mtermvectors
* #4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes #4924.
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes elastic#4901.
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* elastic#4892 : mget
* elastic#4900 : mpercolate
* elastic#4901 : msearch
* elastic#4902 : mtermvectors
* elastic#4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes elastic#4924.
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015
As stated in documentation, we should support `?source=` parameter in msearch REST operations.

This is how to reproduce it:

```sh
curl -XDELETE "http://localhost:9200/test"

curl -XPOST "http://localhost:9200/test/type/1?refresh" -d'{
    "foo": "bar"
}'

cat requests
{}
{"query" : {"match_all" : {}}}

# This one works
curl -XGET localhost:9200/_msearch --data-binary @requests

# This one gives: {"error":"Failed to derive xcontent from org.elasticsearch.common.bytes.BytesArray@0"}
curl -XGET "http://localhost:9200/test/type/_mget?source=%7B%7D%0A%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%0A"
```

Closes elastic#4901.
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015
In recent changes, we added missing support for `source` parameter in some REST APIs:

* elastic#4892 : mget
* elastic#4900 : mpercolate
* elastic#4901 : msearch
* elastic#4902 : mtermvectors
* elastic#4903 : percolate

```java
        BytesReference content = null;
        if (request.hasContent()) {
            content = request.content();
        } else {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

It's definitely better to have:

```java
        BytesReference content = request.content();
        if (!request.hasContent()) {
            String source = request.param("source");
            if (source != null) {
                content = new BytesArray(source);
            }
        }
```

That said, it could be nice to have a single method to manage it for various REST actions.

Closes elastic#4924.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant