You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm unsure if this is a bug or something that wasn't intended to work. In the example below, I'm trying to find the 'foo' object that has the nested 'bar' object named 'bar0'. I then want to know how many nested 'baz' objects the 'foo' contains. After using reverse_nested I can use the first-level fields of 'foo0', but not the nested fields.
Using my actual data this sometimes did work, which is why I thought there might be a bug here. So for example two root objects would contain a certain nested object ('bar'), but only one was returning a proper count of another nested object (baz). With my example I wasn't able to recreate this.
I'm unsure if this is a bug or something that wasn't intended to work. In the example below, I'm trying to find the 'foo' object that has the nested 'bar' object named 'bar0'. I then want to know how many nested 'baz' objects the 'foo' contains. After using reverse_nested I can use the first-level fields of 'foo0', but not the nested fields.
Using my actual data this sometimes did work, which is why I thought there might be a bug here. So for example two root objects would contain a certain nested object ('bar'), but only one was returning a proper count of another nested object (baz). With my example I wasn't able to recreate this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: