Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fit test of DiffSphereTest fails when tried on MantidPlot #6443

Closed
jmborr opened this issue Jul 10, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Fit test of DiffSphereTest fails when tried on MantidPlot #6443

jmborr opened this issue Jul 10, 2012 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Indirect/Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to indirect or inelastic Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done.
Milestone

Comments

@jmborr
Copy link
Member

jmborr commented Jul 10, 2012

Resolution of this ticket is dependent on resolution of ticket http://trac.mantidproject.org/mantid/ticket/4394

Resolution of this ticket is dependent on resolution of ticket http://trac.mantidproject.org/mantid/ticket/5603

The fit test in DiffSphereTest test the convolution of a Gaussian resolution function with a DiffSphere function. The target parameters are:[[BR]]
''Gaussian c=0 h=3.0 sigma=0.62[[BR]]
DiffSphere I=2.9 Q=0.70 R=2.3 D=0.45''[[BR]]

The initial parameters are:[[BR]]
''Gaussian c=0 h=3.0 sigma=0.62[[BR]]
DiffSphere I=1.3 Q=0.70 R=1.4 D=1.5''[[BR]]
Fitting in MantidPlot produces the following error:[[BR]]
'''Error in execution of algorithm Fit:[[BR]]
GSLVector index is out of range'''[[BR]]

Starting with different initial parameters, very close to the target ones:[[BR]]
''Gaussian c=0 h=3.0 sigma=0.62[[BR]]
DiffSphere I=2.7 Q=0.70 R=2.5 D=0.46''[[BR]]
results in another error:[[BR]]
'''Error in execution of algorithm Fit:[[BR]]
Error in function boost::math::sph_bessel_j<e>(e,e): Got x = -29910.0084641663015645, but function requires x > 0.'''[[BR]]

@jmborr
Copy link
Member Author

jmborr commented Jun 3, 2015

This issue was originally trac ticket 5597

@jmborr
Copy link
Member Author

jmborr commented Jun 3, 2015

@jmborr jmborr added Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done. Indirect/Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to indirect or inelastic labels Jun 3, 2015
@jmborr jmborr self-assigned this Jun 3, 2015
@jmborr jmborr added this to the Release 3.1 milestone Jun 3, 2015
@jmborr jmborr closed this as completed Jun 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Indirect/Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to indirect or inelastic Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant