You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Basically, the end of the generated file name will always be the name of the model that was used. Even better if it is possible to fill this information with other parameters used, such as style and denoise level
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mateuspontess
changed the title
[Feature request] Nome do modelo na extensão da imagem gerada
[Feature request] Template name used at end of file name
Aug 17, 2023
I usually generate upscales of the same image with different techniques, then edit them into one, the way it is now, I have to manually rename the images before generating the new one as the output name is always the same.
I would want a way of selecting what will be used to create the name of the output image, things like size multiplier, denoising level, technique or even a timestamp would be very useful.
Just came here to ask the same since it bothers me the most. Whenever i want to upscale something, i do it using different upscalers and settings to pick the best result. I really wonder why this hasn't been implemented. Is not everyone using it like this?
Actually nice would be to have a name format string where you can freely input placeholders, like
"OLDNAME/OLDNAME - UPSCALER (MODEL) MULTIPLIER - TIMESTAMP"
Basically, the end of the generated file name will always be the name of the model that was used. Even better if it is possible to fill this information with other parameters used, such as style and denoise level
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: