Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Good question. We've never done something like this before. Some archive section in the readme? But that might be difficult to find or bloat the readme. And having documentation for other versions in the documentation that is bundled with the code might be confusing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
There is a problem building hipSYCL 0.9.4 + Clang 17, with an easy workaround. ACpp 23.10 works fine.
What would be the best way to document it?
I don't expect it to get fixed, since there are no plans for more 0.9.x releases, but I think it might be helpful to have some way to make a discoverable record.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions