You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For linear models without interactions, we only need E[X_j|X_S] for every single feature X_j to compute the Shapley values, not E[f(X)|X_S]. We should utilize this to compute Shapley values more efficiently for this special case
When this is also combined with approach="gaussian", (and maybe also approach = "copula"?), we could also bypass the Monte Carlo sampling from the fitted models in this case.
Note: Linear models with lower order interactions also lead to simplifications, as it requires E[X_jX_k|X_S] for pairwise interactions and E[X_jX_k_X_l|X_S] for triplets and so on, but it is more tedious to implement that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For linear models without interactions, we only need E[X_j|X_S] for every single feature X_j to compute the Shapley values, not E[f(X)|X_S]. We should utilize this to compute Shapley values more efficiently for this special case
When this is also combined with approach="gaussian", (and maybe also approach = "copula"?), we could also bypass the Monte Carlo sampling from the fitted models in this case.
Note: Linear models with lower order interactions also lead to simplifications, as it requires E[X_jX_k|X_S] for pairwise interactions and E[X_jX_k_X_l|X_S] for triplets and so on, but it is more tedious to implement that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: