Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think about light travel time/tangent plane approx stuff for fast-moving stars #259

Open
sblunt opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sblunt
Copy link
Owner

sblunt commented Aug 25, 2021

Eric says to check out https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A%26A...623A..72K/abstract

@sblunt sblunt added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2021
@semaphoreP
Copy link
Collaborator

Mainly just for stellar astrometry. Only matters for nearby stars.

@enielsen3522
Copy link
Collaborator

You can do a quick order-of-magnitude to see if it's important, using radial velocity and proper motion of the star. The basic question is "how many light-days closer will the star be over the timeframe of interest, and is the expected proper motion over that number of days significant compared to the astrometric error bars?" To pick a completely random star, eps Indi has an RV of -40 km/s, which means over 25 years (the length of time between Hipparcos and Gaia) it gets about 1.2 light-days closer to us. Because eps Indi is so nearby, it moves 4.7" per year, or about 13 mas/day, meaning if you don't take light travel time into account, and your astrometry error bars are 1 mas or less, you'll get the answer significantly wrong. So much like doing rigorous coordinate transformation (also most important for the closets stars), you'd need proper motion and RV to tell if this is important in the first place, but the correction isn't too computationally difficult if it is needed.

@semaphoreP
Copy link
Collaborator

Related to #326 but more about absolute astrometry/spherical geometry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants