You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #976 I was wondering if we should separate Chinese into other options if one day proper font support is added (#974).
The main distinctions here are Mainland Simplified, Taiwanese Traditional, Hong Kong Traditional, and Japanese/Korean though there are also other variants like zh-SG and zh-MO as well as many other Sinitic languages that use 字.
But also maybe there is not much demand for further distinctions other than a traditional Chinese option, in which case we could consider zh-Hant and zh-TW.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #976 I was wondering if we should separate Chinese into other options if one day proper font support is added (#974).
The main distinctions here are Mainland Simplified, Taiwanese Traditional, Hong Kong Traditional, and Japanese/Korean though there are also other variants like zh-SG and zh-MO as well as many other Sinitic languages that use 字.
But also maybe there is not much demand for further distinctions other than a traditional Chinese option, in which case we could consider
zh-Hant
andzh-TW
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: