Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

abstract reduction in jwt #239

Open
darkskygit opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

abstract reduction in jwt #239

darkskygit opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feat New feature or request mod:libs Related to the libs

Comments

@darkskygit
Copy link
Member

In the original design, jwt will be responsible for docking multiple backends and supporting the export of different formats, so the data structure and API are abstracted in multiple layers.
At present, we have re-implemented (or plan to re-implement) these more complex logics in jwst using rust, and we need to streamline the abstraction of jwt to make it easier to use.
I plan to simplify the abstraction of jwt to a level similar to that of @blocksuite/store, but unlike @blocksuite/store, the interface provided by jwt can more flexibly construct block graphs that refer to each other, not for rich text editors The workspaces-pages-blocks tree structure.
The issue is planned to be completed before May, and the pre-requisites are: toeverything/AFFiNE#238

@darkskygit darkskygit self-assigned this Mar 3, 2023
@darkskygit darkskygit added roadmap feat New feature or request mod:libs Related to the libs labels Mar 3, 2023
@doodlewind
Copy link
Member

Let's tracked in #376

@doodlewind doodlewind closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 14, 2023
@darkskygit
Copy link
Member Author

Let's tracked in toeverything/OctoBase#376

jwt not included in affine cloud yet, may include in client

@darkskygit darkskygit reopened this Mar 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request mod:libs Related to the libs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants