-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
incorrect unit label on PSD and FFT #225
Comments
This could be an error on the dastard size or the microscope side, microscope is more likely. |
not sure if this is definitive, but writing my own script using easy client
does extract microvolts. Since that uses dastard, doesn't that mean
microscope is the problem?
…On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:56 PM ggggggggg ***@***.***> wrote:
This could be an error on the dastard size or the microscope side,
microscope is more likely.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#225 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AESEKDIW3QZDVWTTQ6FKCQLSZ5ZANANCNFSM4WBRDCDA>
.
|
Probably, there place it could be
My guess is #2. |
Hey @hubmayr. I am finally looking into this, and I cannot find the problem. Unfortunately, I'm not looking at any data where I know the physical power spectrum level. But I am looking at data where I am interpreting 65536 arbs = 1 Volt, or 1 arb = 15.3 µV. When I see a spectrum peaking at 13172 arbs/sqrt(Hz), it comes to 201 mV/sqrt(Hz). That all looks right to me. So although I guessed (like Galen) that microscope was probably at fault, now I'm not so sure. Is that assumption 1 V = 2^16 arbs wrong for your case? |
Units are listed as mV^2/Hz or mV/sqrt{Hz}, but they are in fact micro Volts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: