Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Startup on 3.1.0 consumes too much cpu #1585

Open
5 tasks done
twsouthwick opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 18 comments
Open
5 tasks done

[BUG] Startup on 3.1.0 consumes too much cpu #1585

twsouthwick opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working

Comments

@twsouthwick
Copy link
Contributor

Environment

Self-Hosted (Docker)

System

Docker version 26.1.1, build 4cf5afa

Version

3.1.0

Describe the problem

After launching the container with switching to 3.1.0, the memory/cpu consumption starts going through the roof. I hadn't put constraints on this container (now I do :)) and it was taking over my VM:

6e8b003b68a1   dashy                       190.58%   739.2MiB / 1GiB       72.19%    8.11kB / 1.68kB   897kB / 24.6kB    212

it will cycle through very quickly to take all the available memory/cpu.

Additional info

No response

Please tick the boxes

@twsouthwick twsouthwick added the 🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working label May 15, 2024
@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi
I can't seem to reproduce your issue, neither lissy I guess.

Could you share a bit more?
RAM usage on dashy container available ram, cpu usage.

Does it ever go down, or just the first build?

@DerLokich
Copy link

Same thing. Updated today and RAM & CPU overloaded

@liss-bot liss-bot added the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 16, 2024
@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

Same thing. Updated today and RAM & CPU overloaded

Could you provide more details?

Does dashy always consume such high amouts, just at start?
Can you share like some more info about ram and cpu usage of the container?
This can be viewed the easiest with portainer.

@DerLokich
Copy link

Same thing. Updated today and RAM & CPU overloaded

Could you provide more details?

Does dashy always consume such high amouts, just at start? Can you share like some more info about ram and cpu usage of the container? This can be viewed the easiest with portainer.

I just make repull to update dashy and right after start i see 4 processes "vue-cli-service build", that consume all avaible memory and CPU, so other containers were not avaible. Even console works with huge lags... Only hard reset helps and right after rebbot need to quick stop dashy

@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

Please be more specific.

Does the usage go down after some time, like 5 min at max?

How much RAM exactly?
How much have you assigned?

The first build of dashy takes a bit more ressources, but there aren't any more rebuilds neccessary later on.

@DerLokich
Copy link

DerLokich commented May 16, 2024

Please be more specific.

Does the usage go down after some time, like 5 min at max?

How much RAM exactly? How much have you assigned?

The first build of dashy takes a bit more ressources, but there aren't any more rebuilds neccessary later on.

I've waited about 30 mins, but as other contaniers doesn't working, i do hard reset.
Host 2 Gb RAM, 2 vCPU, all avaible for dashy.

@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

@DerLokich

Just for testing, could you extend it to 3GB RAM ?

And would you mind sending a screenshot of the ressource usage from container start to like 10minutes?
After freshly pulling the image?

This can be done with portainer:

docker run -d -p 8000:8000 -p 9443:9443 --name portainer --restart=always -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer-ce:latest

image

Thanks!

@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

CrazyWolf13 commented May 16, 2024

To @twsouthwick

1GB is a bit less for dashy, could you try with 2GB?
Dashy uses quite a big amount of ressources for the first build, but since V3, there are no more rebuilds neccessary on config changes.

While I got it to work with a raspberrypi which only has 1GB of RAM, memory management is different compared to like a VM or a big server running dashy.

@liss-bot liss-bot removed the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 17, 2024
@DerLokich
Copy link

@DerLokich

Just for testing, could you extend it to 3GB RAM ?

And would you mind sending a screenshot of the ressource usage from container start to like 10minutes? After freshly pulling the image?

This can be done with portainer:

docker run -d -p 8000:8000 -p 9443:9443 --name portainer --restart=always -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer-ce:latest

image

Thanks!

Can't extend, it's VPS in another country :).

Just for testing i tried to take screenshot in portainer, but VM stuck after eating all resources...
Only last output of htop avaible now:
image

@liss-bot liss-bot added the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 17, 2024
@DerLokich
Copy link

Waited till now, so it's about 90 min, no effect. Hard reset VM.

@twsouthwick
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've updated it to 3gb, and even with the resource constraints, my VM becomes unresponsive:

services:
  dashy:
    container_name: 'dashy'
    image: lissy93/dashy:3.1.0
    restart: no #unless-stopped
    deploy:
      resources:
        limits:
          cpus: '2'
          memory: 3gb

I'll try to gather some more details this weekendn

@twsouthwick
Copy link
Contributor Author

Out of curiosity, what is the value of rebuilding the dashboard in the container? Why not just ship a prebuilt component with the container? I think historically dashy needed the config as part of the build, but now it doesn't need it, right? It makes the dashboard a fairly heavyweight system as it is.

@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

Out of curiosity, what is the value of rebuilding the dashboard in the container?

I think currently it needs to rebuild for other things like for example auth needs a rebuild, custom css, added files like icons, defaultView change and some other very specific things.

So in general file changes or additions not related to conf.yml still require a rebuild.

@Lissy93 Please correct me if I'm wrong.

@CrazyWolf13
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll try to gather some more details this weekendn

Thanks, that'd be awesome!

Because I really cannot reproduce this here and I think lissy has also never been able to reproduce this issue.

@liss-bot liss-bot removed the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 18, 2024
@bobodevil
Copy link

bobodevil commented May 18, 2024

I've had the same issue as well. I thought it was my issue, so I rebuilt the container, but it just chewed up the CPU and memory again.

Edit: I had my watchtower auto update. I just read about the 3.0+ update.
changing -p 8080:8080 and /app/user-data/conf.yml fixed my issue.

@liss-bot liss-bot added the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 18, 2024
@Lissy93
Copy link
Owner

Lissy93 commented May 18, 2024

I'll look into this, as somethings definatley not right here, while Node (used for build) is a bit heavy, it shouldn't ever be consuming that amount of resources.

So far, haven't been able to reproduce.

@DerLokich - it looks like build is being run multiple times, which is weird because it is only needed once.

@liss-bot liss-bot removed the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 18, 2024
@twsouthwick twsouthwick changed the title [BUG] Startup on 3.1.0 consumes too much memory and cpu [BUG] Startup on 3.1.0 consumes too much cpu May 18, 2024
@twsouthwick
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like memory consumption isn't the issue - but it spikes to 20cpus and then the system sends a kill as it's taken all the cpus of the machine.

Screenshot 2024-05-18 144023

And the system sends a kill:

 WARN  A new version of sass-loader is available. Please upgrade for best experience.
error Command failed with signal "SIGKILL".
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
node:events:496
      throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
      ^

Error: write EPIPE
    at target._send (node:internal/child_process:879:20)
    at target.send (node:internal/child_process:752:19)
    at callback (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:32:17)
    at module.exports (/app/node_modules/terser-webpack-plugin/dist/worker.js:13:5)
    at handle (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:44:8)
    at process.<anonymous> (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:55:3)
    at process.emit (node:events:518:28)
    at emit (node:internal/child_process:951:14)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:83:21)
Emitted 'error' event on process instance at:
    at node:internal/child_process:883:39
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:77:11) {
  errno: -32,
  code: 'EPIPE',
  syscall: 'write'
}

Node.js v20.11.1
node:events:496
      throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
      ^

Error: write EPIPE
    at target._send (node:internal/child_process:879:20)
    at target.send (node:internal/child_process:752:19)
    at callback (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:32:17)
    at module.exports (/app/node_modules/terser-webpack-plugin/dist/worker.js:13:5)
    at handle (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:44:8)
    at process.<anonymous> (/app/node_modules/worker-farm/lib/child/index.js:55:3)
    at process.emit (node:events:518:28)
    at emit (node:internal/child_process:951:14)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:83:21)
Emitted 'error' event on process instance at:
    at node:internal/child_process:883:39
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:77:11) {
  errno: -32,
  code: 'EPIPE',
  syscall: 'write'
}

@liss-bot liss-bot added the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label May 18, 2024
@kzkvv
Copy link

kzkvv commented Jun 3, 2024

I see logs and it looks like Dashy is building in docker while startup. It looks strange. It consumes almost all my VPS resources (I have a small VPS with 2 CPU and 2GB RAM. It also takes a lot of time, I've been waiting about 5 minutes and Dashy still doesn't start :(
Maybe I missunderstand the main idea, but I think any application should be built once, packaged once into docker-image. Once, not N-times during each (or first) startup. Or are there some technical reasons to perform build during container startup?

There is a part of my docker-compose with Dashy:

  dashy:
    image: lissy93/dashy
    container_name: dashy
    ports:
      - "4000:8080"
    # Set any environmental variables
    environment:
      - NODE_ENV=production
    # Specify your user ID and group ID. You can find this by running `id -u` and `id -g`
      - UID=1000
      - GID=1000
    restart: unless-stopped
    healthcheck:
      test: ['CMD', 'node', '/app/services/healthcheck']
      interval: 1m30s
      timeout: 10s
      retries: 3
      start_period: 40s

image
image

@liss-bot liss-bot removed the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working
Projects
Status: Awaiting Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants