Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

为什么取消了维持多巴胺中轴的目标呢? #1

Open
XuNeal opened this issue Apr 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

为什么取消了维持多巴胺中轴的目标呢? #1

XuNeal opened this issue Apr 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@XuNeal
Copy link

XuNeal commented Apr 17, 2022

No description provided.

@geekan
Copy link
Owner

geekan commented Apr 17, 2022

  1. 实际我有一个多巴胺的量表,可以做基础的多巴胺评估,但是这块的精确度都不太高,做起来比较感性,欠缺精确计量
  2. 除了多巴胺以外,内啡肽、五羟色胺、催产素也都应该加入KR、量化观测与介入,但同1问题,这几块也不太好做
  3. 调节激素水平的方法,尤其是有效、无害的不多,而且未必能写出来

@geekan geekan added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Apr 18, 2022
@geekan geekan self-assigned this Apr 18, 2022
@eromoe
Copy link

eromoe commented Apr 21, 2022

多巴胺是去寻找刺激,多了是毒药少了会抑郁。内啡肽是你付出努力,最后带来某种内心的平和。

这点确实不太好说,更多是修身养性的问题。

@linranff
Copy link

可以把多巴胺维持在中轴的一些关键信息写出来。很多人对多巴胺的认识还停留在“快乐递质”的误区上,相比怎么维持在中轴,大家多数更需要知道为什么要维持在中轴。

@geekan geekan pinned this issue Apr 23, 2022
@sxh705
Copy link

sxh705 commented Mar 28, 2023

可以看看你的量表吗,简单的评估手段或许是有效的

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants
@geekan @eromoe @XuNeal @sxh705 @linranff and others