-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VR output depends on output sampling rate #520
Comments
did you use the same number of nodes? How many? Which order? Single/double? |
Same number of nodes, 1 node, it's a small setup, which I use for fast testing. Double precision |
Do you have the path to the folder on supermuc? |
/hppfs/work/pr83no/ga35kum3/precomputed-seissol/tpv105 |
So RT is not really matching, and this may translate non-linearly onto rupture speed.
|
To this my hypothesis, you could check RT output with dr/cpp and Dunavant quad rule? |
It doesn't improve with the Dunavant rule:
Note that the VR output for the Dunavant rule is not working due to the shift of quadpoints, which we already discussed in #513. |
I'll try again with the mesh resolution from the Examples Repository... |
ok but overall, can we say that the issue is that:
gives
|
That explains, why it is a problem in tpv105 only and not in the other tpvs. For #522 I'll disable the RT and Vr output. |
Describe the bug
When I run a simulation with different fault output sampling rate, I get different results for
Vr
.Expected behavior
The output at a specific time should not depend on the sampling rate.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
printtimeinterval_sec
to0.1
and1.0
respectively.Screenshots/Console output
Vr after 2s, output sampled with 0.1s
Vr after 2s, output sampled with 1.0s
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: