We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The example of inserting a 2-cell in a 3 cell given in the user manual of Package Generalized Maps lists the inserted 2-cell as std::vector{dh1, ..., dh8}, as shown in the figure below. However, if I understand it correctly, the implementation of is_insertable_cell_2_in_cell_3 and the other example of gm operations indicate it should be std::vector{dh1, dh3, dh5, dh7} instead of the full loop from dh1 to dh8. The latter actually fails the assertion of is_insertable_cell_2_in_cell_3.
std::vector{dh1, ..., dh8}
is_insertable_cell_2_in_cell_3
std::vector{dh1, dh3, dh5, dh7}
dh1
dh8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the issue: this is indeed a bug in the doc. Fixed in #8199.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@eiiijiiiy Thanks. That is now merged and fixed in CGAL master branch. PR #8199
master
thanks all!!
gdamiand
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The example of inserting a 2-cell in a 3 cell given in the user manual of Package Generalized Maps lists the inserted 2-cell as
std::vector{dh1, ..., dh8}
, as shown in the figure below. However, if I understand it correctly, the implementation ofis_insertable_cell_2_in_cell_3
and the other example of gm operations indicate it should bestd::vector{dh1, dh3, dh5, dh7}
instead of the full loop fromdh1
todh8
. The latter actually fails the assertion ofis_insertable_cell_2_in_cell_3
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: