New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transport properties of water #390
Comments
…ms with the transport properties, see also #390
Yes that is clearly an error.
|
Weird. For me in python: In [10]: CoolProp.CoolProp.PropsSI('L','T',500,'P',70e6,'Water')
Out[10]: 0.6974296954778116
In [11]: CoolProp.CoolProp.PropsSI('L','T',700,'P',70e6,'Water')
Out[11]: 0.44961331422897943
In [12]: CoolProp.__version__
Out[12]: u'5.0.5'
In [13]: CoolProp.__gitrevision__
Out[13]: u'984a8f98d79ca890d4d47540670b6918c9d41ed5' |
Is it possible that there is a problem with your plotting code? Can you provide the code for the plots with the horizontal lines? |
I cannot reproduce your results. It looks like there is a problem with the state class. The first value is always correct, but the transport properties do not get updated in the subsequent calls.
|
I think this is a Python problem, see #394 |
there's still a problem, and it has to do with the incompresible water, the NBS. Below you can see my code: In [42]: PropsSI('V','T',85.+273.15,'P',2e5,'INCOMP::NBS') In [43]: import CoolProp In [44]: CoolProp.version In [45]: CoolProp.gitrevision And a request. It is possible to implement in PropsSI also the Prandtl number? |
Confirm still a problem in dev: >>> from CoolProp.CoolProp import PropsSI
>>> PropsSI('V','T',85.+273.15,'P',2e5,'INCOMP::NBS')
0.03339785017964899
>>> PropsSI('V','T',85.+273.15,'P',2e5,'Water')
0.0003331021692555946
>>> import CoolProp
>>> CoolProp.__revision__
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute '__revision__'
>>> CoolProp.__version__
u'5.1.2dev'
>>> CoolProp.__gitrevision__
u'129381efbb5a5cae7dc79019347ab4fe2ad8b109' |
Prandtl is included in development version of 5.1.2: On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Ian Bell ian.h.bell@gmail.com wrote:
|
It looks like thermal conductivity and viscosity only depend on pressure, is that correct? The values differ quite a bit from the incompressible data.
Figures 2 and 4 in http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jpcrd/41/3/10.1063/1.4738955 also suggest that there might be an error.
Any comments anyone?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: