New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PropsSI in saturation region #688
Comments
My first guess is that it is related to R410A being pseudo-pure, but I agree that it looks like we could be more consistent here. |
R410 is a mixture with a glide. For a given pressure, the temperature on the vapor line of the saturation dome is higher than on the liquid line. R22 is a single molecule without a glide. For a given pressure, the temperature at the vapor and liquid lines of the saturation dome are the same. So specifying T and P is fine for defining your saturated liquid state for R410. But for R22, that same T and P could be saturated liquid, saturated vapor, or something in-between under the dome. Thus the error message. |
Thank you for providing a proper description. I guess we can close this issue, can't we, @acuiko ? |
of course. Thanks for the explanation. |
Actually, the first one should be an error. With the full mixture model, T,P are valid inputs through the two-phase region. With the pseudo-pure, not so much. Pseudo-pure EOS are like pure fluid EOS, but not valid in the two-phase region (roughly). |
Hi,
CoolProp.PropsSI("I", "T", 278.15, "P", CoolProp.PropsSI("P","T",278.15,"Q",1,"R410A"), "R410A") works fine, but
CoolProp.PropsSI("I", "T", 278.15, "P", CoolProp.PropsSI("P","T",278.15,"Q",1,"R22"), "R22") gives an error
Saturation pressure [584109 Pa] corresponding to T [278.15 K] is within 1e-4 % of given p [584109 Pa]
Why is not the problem in the first case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: