Once again, I can see that this is intentional coding for some reason. Again, this goes against traditional graphing libraries where if you want to not include a value you don't include it in the data set, not have the graph automatically and silently drop values you intentionally included.

If anyone else finds this a problem (and it was a deal breaker for me), comment out the following lines and sectors won't be "cut"

    for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
        if (defcut && values[i] * 360 / total <= 1.5) {
            cut = i;
            defcut = false;
        }
        if (i > cut) {
            defcut = false;
            values[cut].value += values[i];
            values[cut].others = true;
            others = values[cut].value;
        }
    }
    len = Math.min(cut + 1, values.length);