Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Support for more database adapters #381

Open
hortigado opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Feature: Support for more database adapters #381

hortigado opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@hortigado
Copy link

Hello, lately I've started to notice a bit of slowness on the part of sqlite, not to mention the headache that migrations generate and the errors that it causes when it is not generated correctly.
A solution to this would be to opt for new databases like objectbox that automatically create the database and would help avoid errors and subtracted code.
image

The FlutterData package proposes the same scheme and plans to support objectbox.

image

@tshedor
Copy link
Collaborator

tshedor commented May 8, 2024

What a relief to see a mobile database built with Flutter in mind. The ecosystem has come a long way in four years.

However, as promising as ObjectBox sounds, I have to be honest that I don't have the energy to implement this. I'm no longer working at Dutchie (so this project is purely on personal time), and I'm no longer using Flutter in my day-to-day work (so I'm lagging behind the trends).

Tagging @mateominato or @Doetheman have interest in extending Brick past SQLite. We can leave this issue open for two weeks and see if it attracts any interest from the community. Maybe someone out there wants to add a new provider.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants