Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] Quick Homing Sequence with extra axis #26868

Open
Elias-Ta opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #27005
Open

[FR] Quick Homing Sequence with extra axis #26868

Elias-Ta opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #27005
Labels
T: Feature Request Features requested by users.

Comments

@Elias-Ta
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Are you looking for hardware support?

No response

Describe the feature you want

Hello, I'm grappling with a complex setup involving a 3-axis 3D printer with an additional 5-axis component. I'm experimenting with post-processing tasks such as part removal and other functions using these extra axes. My question is, is there a method to synchronize the homing process for these two additional axes? I'm seeking a solution akin to QUICK_HOME for the X and Y axes.

Previously, I attempted to integrate new functions into G28.cpp, motion.cpp and motion.h, following a similar approach to QUICK_HOME. However, it appears that Marlin controls the extra axes differently, resulting in unsuccessful outcomes.

Additional context

No response

@Elias-Ta Elias-Ta added the T: Feature Request Features requested by users. label Mar 14, 2024
@Elias-Ta Elias-Ta changed the title Homing Sequence with extra axis Quick Homing Sequence with extra axis Mar 14, 2024
@thisiskeithb thisiskeithb changed the title Quick Homing Sequence with extra axis [FR] Quick Homing Sequence with extra axis Apr 16, 2024
@DerAndere1
Copy link
Contributor

I have this Feature (QUICK_HOME_ALL_NON_Z_AXES) in my fork. I will prepare a pull request this week so you can see what changes are required.

@Elias-Ta
Copy link
Author

@DerAndere1 Thank you for your answer, I'm looking forward to your pull request.
BTW, your fork has great features, and it seems great for my next prototype.

@DerAndere1 DerAndere1 linked a pull request Apr 23, 2024 that will close this issue
@DerAndere1
Copy link
Contributor

@Elias-Ta : Please let us know if the changes proposed in PR #27005 work for you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T: Feature Request Features requested by users.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants