Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Round of in fort.2 to SixTrack #620

Closed
vkbo opened this issue May 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Round of in fort.2 to SixTrack #620

vkbo opened this issue May 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@alatina

Comments

@vkbo
Copy link
Contributor

vkbo commented May 4, 2018

The precision of the generated fort.2 file for SixTrack appears to be too low.
A tolerance on the sum of lengths has been added to SixTrack, which is set to 1 µm. The sum is currently off by slightly more than that margin. The fort.2 output precision is 1e-9, which may be the reason for this. Would it be possible to increase the precision of the output?
@madcern
Copy link
Contributor

madcern commented Jun 7, 2018

This is fixed in PR #631

@madcern madcern closed this as completed Jun 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@alatina alatina

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@vkbo @madcern @alatina