Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LAW=66 description omits distribution data #16

Open
whaeck opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

LAW=66 description omits distribution data #16

whaeck opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@whaeck
Copy link
Contributor

whaeck commented Jun 10, 2020

The LAW=66 write up in the ACE specifications do not mention the distribution data that is also produced by ACER and put there. See acefc.f90 (roughly around line 13400)

@jlconlin
Copy link
Contributor

jlconlin commented Apr 5, 2021

@whaeck and/or @HunterBelanger, do you have an example ACE file where we can see the output?

@HunterBelanger
Copy link

This ACE file uses the NBody for MT=16. It starts at index 40113 in the XSS block (C-style indexing).
H2.txt

@paulromano
Copy link
Collaborator

Interesting -- I never realized ACER spits out tabulated distributions for LAW=66 after the main parameters. The density function has an analytical form that can be easily sampled, so that data is superfluous (not used by MCNP, Serpent, or OpenMC).

@whaeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

whaeck commented Apr 7, 2021

It's actually not a problem since we have locators that point to specific pieces in the XSS array. If you look at the XSS array as a contiguous data array, then you might get into trouble if you do not know those distributions are there.

@paulromano
Copy link
Collaborator

Understood. I'm just curious as to why it was put in there in the first place. I suppose MCNP might have used that data once upon a time?

@whaeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

whaeck commented Apr 7, 2021

I assume so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants